MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2780838845 · doi:10.1097/00001416-200701000-00019

Screening Notes: Rehabilitation Specialistʼs Pocket Guide.

2007· article· en· W2780838845 sur OpenAlex
Dennis W. Fell

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Physical Therapy Education · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReferralScope of practiceMedicineFamily medicineHealth care

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Screening Notes: Rehabilitation Specialist's Pocket Guide. Gulick D. Philadelphia, Pa, F A Davis Company, 2006, softcover, spiral-bound, 213 pp, $24.95. Screening Notes is 1 of 7 in the series of Davis's Notes “pocket guides” from F A Davis. Others include OrthoNotes, DermNotes, MedNotes, PsychNotes, ECGNotes, NutriNotes, and the recently released RehabNotes, each of which comes as a concise, portable, spiral-bound, pocket-sized, 3″ × 5″ volume with waterproof, wipe-off, reusable forms and worksheets that could be very useful for collecting patient screening information. While targeted to and obviously valuable for physical therapists—it includes references to the Guide to Physical Therapist Practice—Screening Notes, by Dawn Gulick, PT, PhD, CSCS, ATC, could also be useful for any health care provider. As with any medical screening resource, this pocket guide helps to identify disease processes that fall outside of the physical therapist's scope of practice. Screening Notes begins with a section on alerts/alarms, and the remainder book follows a lifespan approach, including tabbed sections on pediatrics, adolescents, adults, pregnancy, and geriatrics. The book ends with a reference section and an index. Red flags, defined by the author as “a sign or symptom that is a strong predictor of pathology” for each body system (musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, integumentary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine and urologic), are the prime focus in each section. In addition, each section delves into cancer screening, visceral screening, normative values, standardized screening tools, and pain referral patterns. The section on alerts/alarms is an impressive, concise source of medical screening information, including general screening questions, generalized systemic red flags, emergency signs and symptoms, and a chart of vital signs across the lifespan. Descriptions of visceral palpation, pulmonary and cardiac auscultation, general red flags for cancer, and signs and symptoms of specific organ pathology for all the major organs are also included, as well as a brief chart of potential causes for abnormal lab values and a chart of Body Mass Index classifications. The pediatrics section includes normal growth charts for head circumference, height, and weight, and a very helpful chart of pediatric vital sign norms by age. The developmental reflexes, developmental milestones, and development of gait are summarized in tables. The book also provides the Pediatric Balance Scale tool, an immunization schedule and summary of contagious childhood diseases (some with photos), signs and symptoms of common pathology of musculoskeletal and other major symptoms in pediatrics, red flags for autism, and a chart of pediatric neoplasms. The adolescents section begins with a table of blood pressure norms for adolescents ages 10-17 and then provides a helpful summary of signs and symptoms of common adolescent pathology, particularly musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and urogenital disorders, and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Highlights of the adults section include the Ottawa Knee, Ankle, and Foot Rules for orthopedic screening, a chart of arthritic changes comparing osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and gout, and a summary of sign and symptoms and demographic features for the major neuromuscular and cardiovascular and pulmonary pathologies in adults. Screening for myocardial infarction and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is outlined well. The table of integumentary pathology in adults contains a wonderful summary of important points and is well illustrated with photographs. The pregnancy section includes a table that summarizes the physiological changes with pregnancy, precautions during pregnancy, and red flags when exercising during pregnancy. A listing of potential pregnancy-related complications in each body system is followed by a discussion of STDs and a scale for screening postnatal depression. Finally, the geriatrics section is a very helpful resource beginning with a concise table of age-related physiologic changes and expected lab value changes with age. A discussion of fall risk is followed by these specific tools: Gait Abnormality Rating Scale-Modified, Berg Balance Scale, Tinetti Assessment, Timed Up & Go Test, and a home safety checklist. A list to assist in screening for elder abuse is also included. The charts on neuromuscular pathology, integumentary, and endocrine disorders in geriatrics are valuable summaries. Overall the handbook's organization and the content are excellent. There are a few instances of redundancy (eg, arthritic changes and DVT information appear in both the adult and geriatric sections) that could be eliminated with cross-referencing. The ability to take patient notes directly on the pages and later wipe them clean with alcohol for re-use is both novel and convenient. The author states that the purpose of the pocket guide is “to help the health care provider complete a thorough medical screening, identify red flags, and determine if the patient's needs are within the practitioner's scope of practice or if a referral would be appropriate.” Screening Notes would be useful to students and physical therapists as a reference and quick summary of important screening information in clinical practice. The resource would also be useful to students as they review for the National Physical Therapy Examination. I highly recommend the Screening Notes pocket guide as a supplementary resource. Dennis W Fell PT, MD Associate Professor and Chair Department of Physical Therapy College of Allied Health Professions University of South Alabama Mobile, AL

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,909
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,392

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,356
Écart entre enseignants0,341 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle