MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Screening Notes: Rehabilitation Specialistʼs Pocket Guide.

2007· article· en· W2780838845 on OpenAlex
Dennis W. Fell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Therapy Education · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReferralScope of practiceMedicineFamily medicineHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Screening Notes: Rehabilitation Specialist's Pocket Guide. Gulick D. Philadelphia, Pa, F A Davis Company, 2006, softcover, spiral-bound, 213 pp, $24.95. Screening Notes is 1 of 7 in the series of Davis's Notes “pocket guides” from F A Davis. Others include OrthoNotes, DermNotes, MedNotes, PsychNotes, ECGNotes, NutriNotes, and the recently released RehabNotes, each of which comes as a concise, portable, spiral-bound, pocket-sized, 3″ × 5″ volume with waterproof, wipe-off, reusable forms and worksheets that could be very useful for collecting patient screening information. While targeted to and obviously valuable for physical therapists—it includes references to the Guide to Physical Therapist Practice—Screening Notes, by Dawn Gulick, PT, PhD, CSCS, ATC, could also be useful for any health care provider. As with any medical screening resource, this pocket guide helps to identify disease processes that fall outside of the physical therapist's scope of practice. Screening Notes begins with a section on alerts/alarms, and the remainder book follows a lifespan approach, including tabbed sections on pediatrics, adolescents, adults, pregnancy, and geriatrics. The book ends with a reference section and an index. Red flags, defined by the author as “a sign or symptom that is a strong predictor of pathology” for each body system (musculoskeletal, neuromuscular, cardiovascular, pulmonary, integumentary, gastrointestinal, hepatic, endocrine and urologic), are the prime focus in each section. In addition, each section delves into cancer screening, visceral screening, normative values, standardized screening tools, and pain referral patterns. The section on alerts/alarms is an impressive, concise source of medical screening information, including general screening questions, generalized systemic red flags, emergency signs and symptoms, and a chart of vital signs across the lifespan. Descriptions of visceral palpation, pulmonary and cardiac auscultation, general red flags for cancer, and signs and symptoms of specific organ pathology for all the major organs are also included, as well as a brief chart of potential causes for abnormal lab values and a chart of Body Mass Index classifications. The pediatrics section includes normal growth charts for head circumference, height, and weight, and a very helpful chart of pediatric vital sign norms by age. The developmental reflexes, developmental milestones, and development of gait are summarized in tables. The book also provides the Pediatric Balance Scale tool, an immunization schedule and summary of contagious childhood diseases (some with photos), signs and symptoms of common pathology of musculoskeletal and other major symptoms in pediatrics, red flags for autism, and a chart of pediatric neoplasms. The adolescents section begins with a table of blood pressure norms for adolescents ages 10-17 and then provides a helpful summary of signs and symptoms of common adolescent pathology, particularly musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and urogenital disorders, and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Highlights of the adults section include the Ottawa Knee, Ankle, and Foot Rules for orthopedic screening, a chart of arthritic changes comparing osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and gout, and a summary of sign and symptoms and demographic features for the major neuromuscular and cardiovascular and pulmonary pathologies in adults. Screening for myocardial infarction and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is outlined well. The table of integumentary pathology in adults contains a wonderful summary of important points and is well illustrated with photographs. The pregnancy section includes a table that summarizes the physiological changes with pregnancy, precautions during pregnancy, and red flags when exercising during pregnancy. A listing of potential pregnancy-related complications in each body system is followed by a discussion of STDs and a scale for screening postnatal depression. Finally, the geriatrics section is a very helpful resource beginning with a concise table of age-related physiologic changes and expected lab value changes with age. A discussion of fall risk is followed by these specific tools: Gait Abnormality Rating Scale-Modified, Berg Balance Scale, Tinetti Assessment, Timed Up & Go Test, and a home safety checklist. A list to assist in screening for elder abuse is also included. The charts on neuromuscular pathology, integumentary, and endocrine disorders in geriatrics are valuable summaries. Overall the handbook's organization and the content are excellent. There are a few instances of redundancy (eg, arthritic changes and DVT information appear in both the adult and geriatric sections) that could be eliminated with cross-referencing. The ability to take patient notes directly on the pages and later wipe them clean with alcohol for re-use is both novel and convenient. The author states that the purpose of the pocket guide is “to help the health care provider complete a thorough medical screening, identify red flags, and determine if the patient's needs are within the practitioner's scope of practice or if a referral would be appropriate.” Screening Notes would be useful to students and physical therapists as a reference and quick summary of important screening information in clinical practice. The resource would also be useful to students as they review for the National Physical Therapy Examination. I highly recommend the Screening Notes pocket guide as a supplementary resource. Dennis W Fell PT, MD Associate Professor and Chair Department of Physical Therapy College of Allied Health Professions University of South Alabama Mobile, AL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it