Things That Make for a Peaceable Kingdom: An Overview of Christianity and "Cooperativeness" across the Continental Divide
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Perhaps the most widely cited work of U.S.-Canada comparative analysis ever penned by a social scientist is Seymour Martin Lipset's Continental Divide. (1) As the title metaphor suggests, Lipset's influential thesis is that there are important and consistent differences between the values and institutions of these two North American societies. He maintained that observers (usually Americans) who casually assume that Canadian society is merely American society writ small are profoundly mistaken. Much of Lipset's burden in Continental Divide was twofold: synthesizing an impressive array of scholarship empirically verifying differences, and offering insight and analysis regarding the sources of the divergence. With respect to the latter agenda, Lipset took the step (then relatively rare, now somewhat more common) of treating religion as an important factor. Devoting an entire chapter to the sociopolitical implications of religion, Lipset argued that several of the cultural and political attributes that make the American polity unusual--perhaps even exceptional--by comparison to Canada and other advanced industrial societies are, in part, a function of American religious history and demography. Lipset's America is said to be particularly marked by attributes of individualism, competitiveness, a bourgeois economic and political culture, utopian moralism, a crusading and activist ethos, a populist and anti-establishment tendency, God-and-country nationalism, and intolerance for ideological and moral nonconformity. American religion also is said to be implicated in this admixture because it is nonestablishmentarian, voluntaristic, nationalistic, personalistic, pietistic, and fundamentalist. With respect to Canada, Lipset concluded: The differences between religion in Canada and the United States are large and clear-cut. America remains under the strong influence of the Protestant sects. Its northern neighbor adheres to two churches, Catholic and Anglican, and an ecumenical Protestant denomination (the United Church of Canada) that has moved far from the sectarian origins of its component units toward churchlike communitarian values. The overwhelming majority of Canadians (eighty-seven percent) belong to these three mainline denominations. Conservative evangelicals--groups of Baptists, Nazarenes, Pentecostals, Adventists, and so on--constitute only seven percent of Canadians.... Fully one-fifth of Americans adhere to a Baptist church.... Clearly, the different religious traditions of the two countries help to explain much of their varying secular behavior and belief. (2) Lipset also noted, more broadly, that a far higher proportion of American than Canadian Christians, especially Protestant Christians, exhibit high levels of strict doctrinal orthodoxy or fundamentalism--a disposition said to be linked to political as well as social conservatism. (3) In Canada, the tendency toward a relatively more cooperative tenor of Christianity is evidenced in a variety of ways-a lower rate of schism among denominations, fewer new religious movements, less aggressive marketing (especially in the broadcast media) and competition among Christian groups, and a lower proportion of Christians who are likely to make explicit connections between their faith and specific partisan or ideological agendas. Canada was, in short, the foil that Lipset skillfully used to highlight American distinctiveness; a distinctiveness related to Christianity in general and to theologically traditionalist Protestants in particular. If the stereotypical image of America partakes liberally in civil religious cliche (New Jerusalem, city on a hill, etc.), the Canadian national image is markedly different--a peaceable kingdom, whose subjects are polite, deferential, irenic, collectivist, and, in a word, cooperative. Lipset's work threw considerable scholarly weight behind the divergence paradigm in North American studies. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle