MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2784914435 · doi:10.7282/t3tt4v31

Using whole genome sequencing to identify risk alleles for susceptibility to schizophrenia

2017· article· en· W2784914435 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gillian Davis

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGeneticsAlleleBiologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Whole genome sequencingGenomeComputational biologyMedicineGenePsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Schizophrenia is a complex idiopathic neuropsychiatric illness that affects approximately 1% of the general population. Family, twin, and adoption studies indicate a high heritability and strong genetic element to the disease with first degree relatives demonstrating an increased risk of about 10% and monozygotic concordance rates as high as 50%. These values represent the probability of developing schizophrenia based on the presence of genetic components. The high heritability has led to individual studies and meta-analyses being able to produce significant evidence of linkage to specific locations, but studies that used large number of pedigrees have failed to produce statistically significant linkage results. Genome Wide Association Studies of schizophrenia have also produced similarly mixed results. One interpretation of these mixed linkage and association results is that factors such as small effect size and uncontrolled phenotypic variation require very large samples to overcome. This thesis focuses on a different interpretation: genuine genetic differences between definable subsets can mask both linkage and association, and that this problem is worsened in studies that use large samples where the entire sample is analyzed as if it were a genetically homogenous group. The work presented herein begins with linkage studies performed on 22 medium- sized Canadian pedigrees (n=304 individuals) of German or Celtic descent initially recruited if at least three subjects with schizophrenia were available for study. Association studies were conducted on an expanded sample of 30 pedigrees (n=573). Subjects in this sample have been followed for up to 20 years allowing for continued observation of diagnostic stability. We have identified linkage disequilibrium between schizophrenia and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from six discrete genomic regions located under linkage peaks within this sample. We hypothesize that SNPs that generated compelling evidence of association (PPLD|L >= 0.2) produce these scores because they either are, or are in, high LD (r 2 >= 0.8) with functional variants that increase susceptibility to schizophrenia. To that end, whole genome sequencing data from ten individuals within this study (n=10) was analyzed to generate a list of variants within 500 kb upstream and downstream of each risk SNP. A pipeline was created to determine whether or not each SNP in this list was a candidate for further analysis by assessing its LD to the risk SNPs identified by the association studies described above. SNPs determined to be candidates were then genotyped in the entire sample (n=378) so that association could be accurately assessed. Finally, association scores were compared between risk SNPs and candidate SNPs, with variants having higher PPLD|L scores than the referring SNP identified as potential functional candidates. Six SNPs from one genomic region produced higher PPLD|L scores than the referring SNP and so will replace the referring SNP as candidates for further functional analysis. These six SNPs first will be evaluated for additional candidate SNPs 500 kb up- and down-stream in order to determine the best SNP in the region according to the PPLD|L. Additional SNPs have also been identified in some of the other genomic regions that need to be assessed for LD in the full sample. The SNP or SNPs producing the strongest LD signal in each region will need to be further assessed by functional assays to determine their potential role in schizophrenia susceptibility.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,072
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,144

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,061
Tête enseignante GPT0,368
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→Travaux en français237 207→