MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2784914435 · doi:10.7282/t3tt4v31

Using whole genome sequencing to identify risk alleles for susceptibility to schizophrenia

2017· article· en· W2784914435 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gillian Davis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneticsAlleleBiologySchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Whole genome sequencingGenomeComputational biologyMedicineGenePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schizophrenia is a complex idiopathic neuropsychiatric illness that affects approximately 1% of the general population. Family, twin, and adoption studies indicate a high heritability and strong genetic element to the disease with first degree relatives demonstrating an increased risk of about 10% and monozygotic concordance rates as high as 50%. These values represent the probability of developing schizophrenia based on the presence of genetic components. The high heritability has led to individual studies and meta-analyses being able to produce significant evidence of linkage to specific locations, but studies that used large number of pedigrees have failed to produce statistically significant linkage results. Genome Wide Association Studies of schizophrenia have also produced similarly mixed results. One interpretation of these mixed linkage and association results is that factors such as small effect size and uncontrolled phenotypic variation require very large samples to overcome. This thesis focuses on a different interpretation: genuine genetic differences between definable subsets can mask both linkage and association, and that this problem is worsened in studies that use large samples where the entire sample is analyzed as if it were a genetically homogenous group. The work presented herein begins with linkage studies performed on 22 medium- sized Canadian pedigrees (n=304 individuals) of German or Celtic descent initially recruited if at least three subjects with schizophrenia were available for study. Association studies were conducted on an expanded sample of 30 pedigrees (n=573). Subjects in this sample have been followed for up to 20 years allowing for continued observation of diagnostic stability. We have identified linkage disequilibrium between schizophrenia and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from six discrete genomic regions located under linkage peaks within this sample. We hypothesize that SNPs that generated compelling evidence of association (PPLD|L >= 0.2) produce these scores because they either are, or are in, high LD (r 2 >= 0.8) with functional variants that increase susceptibility to schizophrenia. To that end, whole genome sequencing data from ten individuals within this study (n=10) was analyzed to generate a list of variants within 500 kb upstream and downstream of each risk SNP. A pipeline was created to determine whether or not each SNP in this list was a candidate for further analysis by assessing its LD to the risk SNPs identified by the association studies described above. SNPs determined to be candidates were then genotyped in the entire sample (n=378) so that association could be accurately assessed. Finally, association scores were compared between risk SNPs and candidate SNPs, with variants having higher PPLD|L scores than the referring SNP identified as potential functional candidates. Six SNPs from one genomic region produced higher PPLD|L scores than the referring SNP and so will replace the referring SNP as candidates for further functional analysis. These six SNPs first will be evaluated for additional candidate SNPs 500 kb up- and down-stream in order to determine the best SNP in the region according to the PPLD|L. Additional SNPs have also been identified in some of the other genomic regions that need to be assessed for LD in the full sample. The SNP or SNPs producing the strongest LD signal in each region will need to be further assessed by functional assays to determine their potential role in schizophrenia susceptibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology→French-language works237,207→