Richard Linklater's "Before" Series: Time, Duration, and Memory
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis investigates the relationship between the films in Richard Linklater's "Before" series, Before Sunrise (1995), Before Sunset (2004), and Before Midnight (2013).Linklater's career is full of experiments with narrative structure and time.But, the "Before" series is unique among these experiments, and among other series, because of the strategy Linklater used to produce it: what this thesis refers to as Linklater's strategy of duration.This thesis argues that Linklater uses his strategy of duration to explore what it means to be in time.In turn, this creates a temporal experience for the spectator that highlights being in time and their own temporality.Situating this series amongst various approaches to temporality showcases how its simple story belies a complex and multifaceted expression of being in time. 1 The phrase "being in time" is famously related to the philosophy and work of Martin Heidegger.However, for this thesis, it will be used in relation to the philosophies of Henri Bergson, Paul Ricoeur, and R.G. Collingwood, and to a state of duration and passing time."Before" series. 2 In fact, only after completing Before Sunset was Linklater confident enough to begin Boyhood.While Boyhood is a single film, the "Before" series is three films with a single story stretched over eighteen years.The story in the "Before" series is simple.In Before Sunrise, Jesse (Ethan Hawke) and Celine (Julie Delpy) are young travellers who meet by chance in Vienna, where they spend a romantic twelve hours together.Before they separate in the morning, when Celine has to catch her train and Jesse has to catch his early flight, they promise to reunite six months later, in Paris.In Before Sunset, Jesse and Celine meet again, again apparently by chance, in Paris, having not met as they had originally planned nine years earlier.While they are different people now since the last time they saw each other, their romance seems to be rekindled at the conclusion of the film.A further nine years later, in Before Midnight, Jesse and Celine, having settled into a relationship, and are on vacation in Greece with their twin daughters, but, where their romance was once youthful and spontaneous, they now face the monotony and responsibility of parenting.They argue, seemingly break up, yet seem to save their relationship in the end.What seperates the "Before" series from other fiction film series is the unique relationship between the films in the series to one another, as well as the way this unique relationship manifests in the treatment of time in the individual films.This unique relationship is the result of what I will call Linklater's strategy of duration.Duration is defined as "Lasting, continuance in time; the continuance or length of time; the time during which a thing, action, or state, 2 Maria San Filippo, "Growing Old Together: Linklater's Before Trilogy in the Twilight Years of Arthouse Distribution," Film Quarterly Vol.68 No. 3 (2015): 53. 5 See: Thomas A. Christie, The Cinema of Richard Linklater (Kent: Crescent Moon Publishing, 2008), 27: "…the only real meaningful answer in narrative terms [to the question, what is Slacker about] is that it is about an hour and a half long." 6 David Bordwell, The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies, (Berkeley:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».