MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785522059 · doi:10.22215/etd/2016-11631

Richard Linklater's "Before" Series: Time, Duration, and Memory

2016· dissertation· en· W2785522059 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew R. Sanders

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemporalityDuration (music)Series (stratigraphy)NarrativeMidnightPsychologyAestheticsArtPsychoanalysisEpistemologyLiteraturePhilosophyGeologyPhysicsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis investigates the relationship between the films in Richard Linklater's "Before" series, Before Sunrise (1995), Before Sunset (2004), and Before Midnight (2013).Linklater's career is full of experiments with narrative structure and time.But, the "Before" series is unique among these experiments, and among other series, because of the strategy Linklater used to produce it: what this thesis refers to as Linklater's strategy of duration.This thesis argues that Linklater uses his strategy of duration to explore what it means to be in time.In turn, this creates a temporal experience for the spectator that highlights being in time and their own temporality.Situating this series amongst various approaches to temporality showcases how its simple story belies a complex and multifaceted expression of being in time. 1 The phrase "being in time" is famously related to the philosophy and work of Martin Heidegger.However, for this thesis, it will be used in relation to the philosophies of Henri Bergson, Paul Ricoeur, and R.G. Collingwood, and to a state of duration and passing time."Before" series. 2 In fact, only after completing Before Sunset was Linklater confident enough to begin Boyhood.While Boyhood is a single film, the "Before" series is three films with a single story stretched over eighteen years.The story in the "Before" series is simple.In Before Sunrise, Jesse (Ethan Hawke) and Celine (Julie Delpy) are young travellers who meet by chance in Vienna, where they spend a romantic twelve hours together.Before they separate in the morning, when Celine has to catch her train and Jesse has to catch his early flight, they promise to reunite six months later, in Paris.In Before Sunset, Jesse and Celine meet again, again apparently by chance, in Paris, having not met as they had originally planned nine years earlier.While they are different people now since the last time they saw each other, their romance seems to be rekindled at the conclusion of the film.A further nine years later, in Before Midnight, Jesse and Celine, having settled into a relationship, and are on vacation in Greece with their twin daughters, but, where their romance was once youthful and spontaneous, they now face the monotony and responsibility of parenting.They argue, seemingly break up, yet seem to save their relationship in the end.What seperates the "Before" series from other fiction film series is the unique relationship between the films in the series to one another, as well as the way this unique relationship manifests in the treatment of time in the individual films.This unique relationship is the result of what I will call Linklater's strategy of duration.Duration is defined as "Lasting, continuance in time; the continuance or length of time; the time during which a thing, action, or state, 2 Maria San Filippo, "Growing Old Together: Linklater's Before Trilogy in the Twilight Years of Arthouse Distribution," Film Quarterly Vol.68 No. 3 (2015): 53. 5 See: Thomas A. Christie, The Cinema of Richard Linklater (Kent: Crescent Moon Publishing, 2008), 27: "…the only real meaningful answer in narrative terms [to the question, what is Slacker about] is that it is about an hour and a half long." 6 David Bordwell, The Way Hollywood Tells It: Story and Style in Modern Movies, (Berkeley:

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNarrative Theory and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207