MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2785663576

Mechanical anchorage of prestressed CFRP tendons : theory and tests

2008· article· en· W2785663576 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anders Bennitz

Notice bibliographique

RevueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStructural engineeringPrestressed concreteEngineeringForensic engineeringGeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) are slowly becoming important materials to consider also for a structural engineer. They are light-weight, insensitive to corrosion and have highly modifiable mechanical properties. Strengths five times higher than that of ordinary reinforcing steel are common and that combined with the possibility to vary the modulus of elasticity makes them suitable to use in combination with concrete. Carbon fibre based polymers (CFRPs) especially serve as an excellent substitute for steel in the rehabilitation of structures. A case study on that subject is presented in this thesis while the focus lies on the use of CFRP as a material for use in prestressing tendons, and to be more precise, on the anchorage of prestressed CFRP tendons. FRPs orthotropic properties highly influence their behaviour in different directions. The best properties are reached through tension in the fibre direction, and as such CFRP is as good for prestressing tendons as any prestressing steel. It is also not sensitive to corrosion and easy to work with due to its light weight. Mechanical properties in the transverse direction are however not that advantageous and early attempts to anchor CFRP bars by traditional mechanical prestressing anchorages have consistently failed. A thorough program for the development of a successful anchorage has therefore been undertaken. In a first step a literature review was conducted to investigate CFRPs possibilities to replace steel in prestressing applications, internally and externally, as well as traditional anchorage techniques for steel tendons. From the literature study it was concluded that CFRP may very well serve as tendons but some doubts also arose concerning the environmental effect on the CFRPs long term behaviour and the materials ability to work under bent conditions in multispan applications. The traditional anchorages will however not work properly, all of them use mechanical grip to keep the steel stressed. This is possible through the steels capacity to yield but not suitable to anchor the brittle CFRP. A state-of-the-art survey on attempts made globally during the last 15 years to come up with a suitable frictional anchorage has also been performed. It can be seen that several ideas are discussed, often in one or two publications. One Canadian research team, Al-Mayah et al. (2001-2008), has taken the development further and focused on variations of the traditional wedge anchorage. Based on the knowledge gained from the literature it was decided to further concentrate on a conical anchorage with a barrel of steel and three smooth wedges in aluminium. Simple analytical approaches to the conical wedge anchorage with smooth interior surfaces prove the importance of the angle in the wedge-barrel interface. Also frictional behaviour in the rod-wedge and wedge-barrel interfaces proves to be important factors. Numerical studies of these and other geometrical and mechanical properties give further input into the development of a pilot anchorage to be tested in the laboratory. The optimum angle of the wedge towards the barrel seems to be between 2-3°. The thickness of the wedge should be kept as small as possible and it is favourable with high strength steel in the barrel. A small displacement of the wedges towards the unloaded end of the tendon in the design of the anchorage does also reduce the overall slip of the rod during tension. After overcoming initial problems not discovered in the analytical or numerical models the developed anchorage performed well during laboratory tests. In short term tests performed on an 8 mm thick circular rod 100 % of the rods ultimate capacity was reached. During the tests measurements of displacements and strains were performed. Fibre Optical Sensors (FOS - Bragg gratings) were for the first time included in the interior of the anchorage to give a complete picture of the load phase. These measurements were compared to a refined finite element model and show reasonable agreement. The largest source of error is assumed to be the complicated frictional behaviour in the material interfaces and the transverse material properties of the CFRP. Lastly a case study on the strengthening of a 50 year old trough bridge in Frövi is included. The bridge was successfully strengthened for bending in the transverse direction with 23 Near Surface Mounted Reinforcement (NSMR) bars in the lower part of the slab while 11 holes are drilled underneath the upper steel reinforcement to facilitate CFRP tubes with an outer diameter of 32 mm and a thickness of 4 mm. The lack of bending capacity was discovered by a consultant in 2005 and calculations with a new approach in this thesis show that the strengthening was necessary although on a minor scale. New calculations of the capacity show that the bridge's capacity after strengthening is well above the design load and measurements on site secure that the CFRP is utilized correctly as a load carrier.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,473
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,961

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,241
Écart entre enseignants0,225 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)Même sujetStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteTravaux en français237 207