MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2785663576

Mechanical anchorage of prestressed CFRP tendons : theory and tests

2008· article· en· W2785663576 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anders Bennitz

Bibliographic record

VenueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringPrestressed concreteEngineeringForensic engineeringGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fibre Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) are slowly becoming important materials to consider also for a structural engineer. They are light-weight, insensitive to corrosion and have highly modifiable mechanical properties. Strengths five times higher than that of ordinary reinforcing steel are common and that combined with the possibility to vary the modulus of elasticity makes them suitable to use in combination with concrete. Carbon fibre based polymers (CFRPs) especially serve as an excellent substitute for steel in the rehabilitation of structures. A case study on that subject is presented in this thesis while the focus lies on the use of CFRP as a material for use in prestressing tendons, and to be more precise, on the anchorage of prestressed CFRP tendons. FRPs orthotropic properties highly influence their behaviour in different directions. The best properties are reached through tension in the fibre direction, and as such CFRP is as good for prestressing tendons as any prestressing steel. It is also not sensitive to corrosion and easy to work with due to its light weight. Mechanical properties in the transverse direction are however not that advantageous and early attempts to anchor CFRP bars by traditional mechanical prestressing anchorages have consistently failed. A thorough program for the development of a successful anchorage has therefore been undertaken. In a first step a literature review was conducted to investigate CFRPs possibilities to replace steel in prestressing applications, internally and externally, as well as traditional anchorage techniques for steel tendons. From the literature study it was concluded that CFRP may very well serve as tendons but some doubts also arose concerning the environmental effect on the CFRPs long term behaviour and the materials ability to work under bent conditions in multispan applications. The traditional anchorages will however not work properly, all of them use mechanical grip to keep the steel stressed. This is possible through the steels capacity to yield but not suitable to anchor the brittle CFRP. A state-of-the-art survey on attempts made globally during the last 15 years to come up with a suitable frictional anchorage has also been performed. It can be seen that several ideas are discussed, often in one or two publications. One Canadian research team, Al-Mayah et al. (2001-2008), has taken the development further and focused on variations of the traditional wedge anchorage. Based on the knowledge gained from the literature it was decided to further concentrate on a conical anchorage with a barrel of steel and three smooth wedges in aluminium. Simple analytical approaches to the conical wedge anchorage with smooth interior surfaces prove the importance of the angle in the wedge-barrel interface. Also frictional behaviour in the rod-wedge and wedge-barrel interfaces proves to be important factors. Numerical studies of these and other geometrical and mechanical properties give further input into the development of a pilot anchorage to be tested in the laboratory. The optimum angle of the wedge towards the barrel seems to be between 2-3°. The thickness of the wedge should be kept as small as possible and it is favourable with high strength steel in the barrel. A small displacement of the wedges towards the unloaded end of the tendon in the design of the anchorage does also reduce the overall slip of the rod during tension. After overcoming initial problems not discovered in the analytical or numerical models the developed anchorage performed well during laboratory tests. In short term tests performed on an 8 mm thick circular rod 100 % of the rods ultimate capacity was reached. During the tests measurements of displacements and strains were performed. Fibre Optical Sensors (FOS - Bragg gratings) were for the first time included in the interior of the anchorage to give a complete picture of the load phase. These measurements were compared to a refined finite element model and show reasonable agreement. The largest source of error is assumed to be the complicated frictional behaviour in the material interfaces and the transverse material properties of the CFRP. Lastly a case study on the strengthening of a 50 year old trough bridge in Frövi is included. The bridge was successfully strengthened for bending in the transverse direction with 23 Near Surface Mounted Reinforcement (NSMR) bars in the lower part of the slab while 11 holes are drilled underneath the upper steel reinforcement to facilitate CFRP tubes with an outer diameter of 32 mm and a thickness of 4 mm. The lack of bending capacity was discovered by a consultant in 2005 and calculations with a new approach in this thesis show that the strengthening was necessary although on a minor scale. New calculations of the capacity show that the bridge's capacity after strengthening is well above the design load and measurements on site secure that the CFRP is utilized correctly as a load carrier.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.473
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)Same topicStructural Behavior of Reinforced ConcreteFrench-language works237,207