Successful digital cholangioscopy removal of a stent-retriever tip migrated into the periphery of the bile duct
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Various techniques to dilate occluded uncovered metal stents (UMSs) have been reported [ 1 ]. A stent retriever (Soehendra stent retriever, SSR-7; Cook, Tokyo, Japan) can also be used as a dilation device in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. Herein, we describe a case in which the tip of a stent retriever migrated into the periphery of the bile duct and was successfully removed using digital cholangioscopy. An 85-year-old man had undergone placement of multiple UMSs for hepatic hilar biliary stricture 1 year previously. Since the stent placement, re-intervention had been performed three times because of stent occlusion; however, he was admitted to our hospital because of a recurrence of obstructive jaundice. Computed tomography (CT) scanning showed anterior bile duct dilatation, and re-intervention was attempted. First, the guidewire was placed into the anterior bile duct. Neither an ERCP catheter nor a balloon catheter could be advanced into the anterior bile duct through the mesh of the UMS, so recanalization using a stent retriever was attempted. However, during this procedure, the tip of the stent retriever became detached and migrated into the periphery of the bile duct ([ Fig. 1 ]). To remove this migrated stent-retriever tip, several techniques including the use of biopsy forceps, basket catheter, and balloon catheter were performed, but without successful removal being achieved. Fig. 1 Radiographic image showing the migrated tip of the Soehendra stent retriever (arrow) in the periphery of the bile duct. Removal under direct visualization was therefore attempted using a digital single-operator intraductal cholangioscope (IDC; SPY-DS; Boston Scientific). The cholangioscope was advanced into the periphery of the anterior bile duct through the UMS until the migrated tip of the stent retriever could be seen ([ Fig. 2 ]; [ Video 1 ]). Next, the migrated tip was grasped by a SPY-Bite device ([ Fig. 3 a, b ]). The cholangioscope was then itself carefully withdrawn from the bile duct into the intestine ([ Fig. 3 c ]), successfully removing the migrated tip without any adverse events ([ Fig. 4 ]). Fig. 2 Cholangioscopic view showing the tip of the stent retriever using a digital intraductal cholangioscope (SPY-DS). Video 1 The intraductal cholangioscope (SPY-DS) is inserted into the periphery of the bile duct through the uncovered metal stents and the migrated tip of the stent retriever is observed. The migrated tip is then grasped by the SPY-Bite device under direct visualization, allowing it to be successfully removed. Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download Fig. 3 The tip of the stent retriever is grasped using the SPY-Bite device: a on radiographic image; b on cholangioscopic image; and c is carefully removed. Fig. 4 The tip of the stent retriever following its successful removal. In conclusion, this case may be the first to show this adverse event associated with a stent retriever, along with the subsequent successful removal. Direct visualization with the digital IDC was helpful in this case. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AK_2AD Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».