Successful digital cholangioscopy removal of a stent-retriever tip migrated into the periphery of the bile duct
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Various techniques to dilate occluded uncovered metal stents (UMSs) have been reported [ 1 ]. A stent retriever (Soehendra stent retriever, SSR-7; Cook, Tokyo, Japan) can also be used as a dilation device in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. Herein, we describe a case in which the tip of a stent retriever migrated into the periphery of the bile duct and was successfully removed using digital cholangioscopy. An 85-year-old man had undergone placement of multiple UMSs for hepatic hilar biliary stricture 1 year previously. Since the stent placement, re-intervention had been performed three times because of stent occlusion; however, he was admitted to our hospital because of a recurrence of obstructive jaundice. Computed tomography (CT) scanning showed anterior bile duct dilatation, and re-intervention was attempted. First, the guidewire was placed into the anterior bile duct. Neither an ERCP catheter nor a balloon catheter could be advanced into the anterior bile duct through the mesh of the UMS, so recanalization using a stent retriever was attempted. However, during this procedure, the tip of the stent retriever became detached and migrated into the periphery of the bile duct ([ Fig. 1 ]). To remove this migrated stent-retriever tip, several techniques including the use of biopsy forceps, basket catheter, and balloon catheter were performed, but without successful removal being achieved. Fig. 1 Radiographic image showing the migrated tip of the Soehendra stent retriever (arrow) in the periphery of the bile duct. Removal under direct visualization was therefore attempted using a digital single-operator intraductal cholangioscope (IDC; SPY-DS; Boston Scientific). The cholangioscope was advanced into the periphery of the anterior bile duct through the UMS until the migrated tip of the stent retriever could be seen ([ Fig. 2 ]; [ Video 1 ]). Next, the migrated tip was grasped by a SPY-Bite device ([ Fig. 3 a, b ]). The cholangioscope was then itself carefully withdrawn from the bile duct into the intestine ([ Fig. 3 c ]), successfully removing the migrated tip without any adverse events ([ Fig. 4 ]). Fig. 2 Cholangioscopic view showing the tip of the stent retriever using a digital intraductal cholangioscope (SPY-DS). Video 1 The intraductal cholangioscope (SPY-DS) is inserted into the periphery of the bile duct through the uncovered metal stents and the migrated tip of the stent retriever is observed. The migrated tip is then grasped by the SPY-Bite device under direct visualization, allowing it to be successfully removed. Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download Fig. 3 The tip of the stent retriever is grasped using the SPY-Bite device: a on radiographic image; b on cholangioscopic image; and c is carefully removed. Fig. 4 The tip of the stent retriever following its successful removal. In conclusion, this case may be the first to show this adverse event associated with a stent retriever, along with the subsequent successful removal. Direct visualization with the digital IDC was helpful in this case. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AK_2AD Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".