MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2786500916 · doi:10.1055/s-0044-101019

Successful digital cholangioscopy removal of a stent-retriever tip migrated into the periphery of the bile duct

2018· article· en· W2786500916 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Takeshi Ogura, Atsushi Okuda, Akira Miyano, Nobu Nishioka, Kazuhide Higuchi

Bibliographic record

VenueEndoscopy · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBile ductStentBiliary stentGeneral surgeryRadiologyLabrador RetrieverSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Various techniques to dilate occluded uncovered metal stents (UMSs) have been reported [ 1 ]. A stent retriever (Soehendra stent retriever, SSR-7; Cook, Tokyo, Japan) can also be used as a dilation device in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) [ 2 ] [ 3 ]. Herein, we describe a case in which the tip of a stent retriever migrated into the periphery of the bile duct and was successfully removed using digital cholangioscopy. An 85-year-old man had undergone placement of multiple UMSs for hepatic hilar biliary stricture 1 year previously. Since the stent placement, re-intervention had been performed three times because of stent occlusion; however, he was admitted to our hospital because of a recurrence of obstructive jaundice. Computed tomography (CT) scanning showed anterior bile duct dilatation, and re-intervention was attempted. First, the guidewire was placed into the anterior bile duct. Neither an ERCP catheter nor a balloon catheter could be advanced into the anterior bile duct through the mesh of the UMS, so recanalization using a stent retriever was attempted. However, during this procedure, the tip of the stent retriever became detached and migrated into the periphery of the bile duct ([ Fig. 1 ]). To remove this migrated stent-retriever tip, several techniques including the use of biopsy forceps, basket catheter, and balloon catheter were performed, but without successful removal being achieved. Fig. 1 Radiographic image showing the migrated tip of the Soehendra stent retriever (arrow) in the periphery of the bile duct. Removal under direct visualization was therefore attempted using a digital single-operator intraductal cholangioscope (IDC; SPY-DS; Boston Scientific). The cholangioscope was advanced into the periphery of the anterior bile duct through the UMS until the migrated tip of the stent retriever could be seen ([ Fig. 2 ]; [ Video 1 ]). Next, the migrated tip was grasped by a SPY-Bite device ([ Fig. 3 a, b ]). The cholangioscope was then itself carefully withdrawn from the bile duct into the intestine ([ Fig. 3 c ]), successfully removing the migrated tip without any adverse events ([ Fig. 4 ]). Fig. 2 Cholangioscopic view showing the tip of the stent retriever using a digital intraductal cholangioscope (SPY-DS). Video 1 The intraductal cholangioscope (SPY-DS) is inserted into the periphery of the bile duct through the uncovered metal stents and the migrated tip of the stent retriever is observed. The migrated tip is then grasped by the SPY-Bite device under direct visualization, allowing it to be successfully removed. Quality: mobile 360 480 720 Download Fig. 3 The tip of the stent retriever is grasped using the SPY-Bite device: a on radiographic image; b on cholangioscopic image; and c is carefully removed. Fig. 4 The tip of the stent retriever following its successful removal. In conclusion, this case may be the first to show this adverse event associated with a stent retriever, along with the subsequent successful removal. Direct visualization with the digital IDC was helpful in this case. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AK_2AD Endoscopy E-Videos https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online. This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEndoscopySame topicGallbladder and Bile Duct DisordersFrench-language works237,207