Europe and the Globe, 1350–1700
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Artistic exchanges across geographical and cultural distances have registered in the arts from time immemorial, but the current focus on contemporary globalization has stimulated vigorous scholarly attention to processes of interculturation. Established art historical categories, typically defined by regional or national boundaries, are ill-suited to apprehending questions of intercultural exchange; art historians are interrogating patterns of disciplinary practice, challenging Eurocentric assumptions, and seeking better strategies for analyzing these dynamic interactions. This article targets works that specifically address aspects of artistic exchange between Europe and other parts of the world between 1350 and 1700, along with artistic legacies of that early interaction. By definition, all entries address multiple cultures—hence, the challenge of structuring such a bibliography—but they are organized insofar as possible by area of geographic emphasis. An especially promising direction of scholarship in this subject decenters Europe, despite following European networks or documentation, like Um 2017 (cited under Asia) and Park 2020 (cited under Spain). And given the rapidly burgeoning scholarship in this area, this offering is a point of departure for a marvelous and ongoing voyage of discovery. So, to begin: during the late Middle Ages some Europeans followed the Silk Road overland across Eurasia, but the Ottoman blockade of these land routes in 1453 spurred the European search for a sea route to the Indies, launching a European “age of exploration” that lasted from the late 15th through the 17th centuries. The Portuguese worked their way down the African coast and eventually established coastal trading posts from East Africa to Japan. The Spanish sailed west to the New World, joining with Portugal after 1580 to create an Iberian force that dominated early global exploration. The revolt of the Netherlands against Spanish rule prompted the Dutch to find their own way to the Spice Islands, resulting in their rise to global primacy in the 17th century. France and the German lands were less keenly focused overseas, but the English competed worldwide until winning global preeminence in the 18th century. Throughout all these cultural interactions, art objects and materials were among the cargo transported between Europe and the far corners of the world. Travelers, some professional artists among them, recorded their impressions; printmaking and publishing facilitated broad circulation of ideas and imagery. Architecture left enduring evidence of exchange in far-flung places. Ceramics and textiles were sought-after commodities along with the coveted spices, and curiosity collections disseminated cultural artifacts among Europe’s royalty and intelligentsia as well as in sophisticated courts in Persia (Iran), India, China, and Japan. Cross-fertilization in the arts took many forms, and the literature that treats it is voluminous and steadily expanding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».