MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W27906384 · doi:10.1039/c6nr06701h

Uncertainty in the Bifurcation Diagram of a Model of Heart Rhythm Dynamics

2014· dissertation· en· W27906384 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Caroline Ring

Notice bibliographique

RevueNanoscale · 2014
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
ThématiqueComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésBifurcation diagramRhythmBifurcationDiagramDynamics (music)Heart RhythmStatistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineStatisticsNonlinear system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To understand the underlying mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias, computational models are used to study heart rhythm dynamics. The parameters of these models carry inherent uncertainty. Therefore, to interpret the results of these models, uncertainty quantification (UQ) and sensitivity analysis (SA) are important. Polynomial chaos (PC) is a computationally efficient method for UQ and SA in which a model output Y, dependent on some independent uncertain parameters represented by a random vector ξ, is approximated as a spectral expansion in multidimensional orthogonal polynomials in ξ. The expansion can then be used to characterize the uncertainty in Y. PC methods were applied to UQ and SA of the dynamics of a two-dimensional return-map model of cardiac action potential duration (APD) restitution in a paced single cell. Uncertainty was considered in four parameters of the model: three time constants and the pacing stimulus strength. The basic cycle length (BCL) (the period between stimuli) was treated as the control parameter. Model dynamics was characterized with bifurcation analysis, which determines the APD and stability of fixed points of the model at a range of BCLs, and the BCLs at which bifurcations occur. These quantities can be plotted in a bifurcation diagram, which summarizes the dynamics of the model. PC UQ and SA were performed for these quantities. UQ results were summarized in a novel probabilistic bifurcation diagram that visualizes the APD and stability of fixed points as uncertain quantities. Classical PC methods assume that model outputs exist and reasonably smooth over the full domain of ξ. Because models of heart rhythm often exhibit bifurcations and discontinuities, their outputs may not obey the existence and smoothness assumptions on the full domain, but only on some subdomains which may be irregularly shaped. On these subdomains, the random variables representing the parameters may no longer be independent. PC methods therefore must be modified for analysis of these discontinuous quantities. The Rosenblatt transformation maps the variables on the subdomain onto a rectangular domain; the transformed variables are independent and uniformly distributed. A new numerical estimation of the Rosenblatt transformation was developed that improves accuracy and computational efficiency compared to existing kernel density estimation methods. PC representations of the outputs in the transformed variables were then constructed. Coefficients of the PC expansions were estimated using Bayesian inference methods. For discontinuous model outputs, SA was performed using a sampling-based variance-reduction method, with the PC estimation used as an efficient proxy for the full model. To evaluate the accuracy of the PC methods, PC UQ and SA results were compared to large-sample Monte Carlo UQ and SA results. PC UQ and SA of the fixed point APDs, and of the probability that a stable fixed point existed at each BCL, was very close to MC UQ results for those quantities. However, PC UQ and SA of the bifurcation BCLs was less accurate compared to MC results. The computational time required for PC and Monte Carlo methods was also compared. PC analysis (including Rosenblatt transformation and Bayesian inference) required less than 10 total hours of computational time, of which approximately 30 minutes was devoted to model evaluations, compared to approximately 65 hours required for Monte Carlo sampling of the model outputs at 1 × 10 6 ξ points. PC methods provide a useful framework for efficient UQ and SA of the bifurcation diagram of a model of cardiac APD dynamics. Model outputs with bifurcations and discontinuities can be analyzed using modified PC methods. The methods applied and developed in this study may be extended to other models of heart rhythm dynamics. These methods have potential for use for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in many applications of these models, including simulation studies of heart rate variability, cardiac pathologies, and interventions.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,213 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueNanoscaleMême sujetComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisTravaux en français237 207