MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W27906384 · doi:10.1039/c6nr06701h

Uncertainty in the Bifurcation Diagram of a Model of Heart Rhythm Dynamics

2014· dissertation· en· W27906384 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Caroline Ring

Bibliographic record

VenueNanoscale · 2014
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBifurcation diagramRhythmBifurcationDiagramDynamics (music)Heart RhythmStatistical physicsMathematicsPhysicsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineStatisticsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To understand the underlying mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias, computational models are used to study heart rhythm dynamics. The parameters of these models carry inherent uncertainty. Therefore, to interpret the results of these models, uncertainty quantification (UQ) and sensitivity analysis (SA) are important. Polynomial chaos (PC) is a computationally efficient method for UQ and SA in which a model output Y, dependent on some independent uncertain parameters represented by a random vector ξ, is approximated as a spectral expansion in multidimensional orthogonal polynomials in ξ. The expansion can then be used to characterize the uncertainty in Y. PC methods were applied to UQ and SA of the dynamics of a two-dimensional return-map model of cardiac action potential duration (APD) restitution in a paced single cell. Uncertainty was considered in four parameters of the model: three time constants and the pacing stimulus strength. The basic cycle length (BCL) (the period between stimuli) was treated as the control parameter. Model dynamics was characterized with bifurcation analysis, which determines the APD and stability of fixed points of the model at a range of BCLs, and the BCLs at which bifurcations occur. These quantities can be plotted in a bifurcation diagram, which summarizes the dynamics of the model. PC UQ and SA were performed for these quantities. UQ results were summarized in a novel probabilistic bifurcation diagram that visualizes the APD and stability of fixed points as uncertain quantities. Classical PC methods assume that model outputs exist and reasonably smooth over the full domain of ξ. Because models of heart rhythm often exhibit bifurcations and discontinuities, their outputs may not obey the existence and smoothness assumptions on the full domain, but only on some subdomains which may be irregularly shaped. On these subdomains, the random variables representing the parameters may no longer be independent. PC methods therefore must be modified for analysis of these discontinuous quantities. The Rosenblatt transformation maps the variables on the subdomain onto a rectangular domain; the transformed variables are independent and uniformly distributed. A new numerical estimation of the Rosenblatt transformation was developed that improves accuracy and computational efficiency compared to existing kernel density estimation methods. PC representations of the outputs in the transformed variables were then constructed. Coefficients of the PC expansions were estimated using Bayesian inference methods. For discontinuous model outputs, SA was performed using a sampling-based variance-reduction method, with the PC estimation used as an efficient proxy for the full model. To evaluate the accuracy of the PC methods, PC UQ and SA results were compared to large-sample Monte Carlo UQ and SA results. PC UQ and SA of the fixed point APDs, and of the probability that a stable fixed point existed at each BCL, was very close to MC UQ results for those quantities. However, PC UQ and SA of the bifurcation BCLs was less accurate compared to MC results. The computational time required for PC and Monte Carlo methods was also compared. PC analysis (including Rosenblatt transformation and Bayesian inference) required less than 10 total hours of computational time, of which approximately 30 minutes was devoted to model evaluations, compared to approximately 65 hours required for Monte Carlo sampling of the model outputs at 1 × 10 6 ξ points. PC methods provide a useful framework for efficient UQ and SA of the bifurcation diagram of a model of cardiac APD dynamics. Model outputs with bifurcations and discontinuities can be analyzed using modified PC methods. The methods applied and developed in this study may be extended to other models of heart rhythm dynamics. These methods have potential for use for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in many applications of these models, including simulation studies of heart rate variability, cardiac pathologies, and interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanoscaleSame topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207