Abstract P5-21-03: Palbociclib (PAL) + letrozole (LET) as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC): Efficacy and safety updates with longer follow-up across patient subgroups
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapy (ET) has been the primary first-line (1L) therapy for ER+ ABC. In the PALOMA-2 study (NCT01740427), PAL (P)+LET (L) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; HR=0.58, P<.001) after a median 23 mo follow-up (FU) (Finn et al. NEJM 2016). Here we report more mature PFS overall and in subgroups, with (w/) longer FU. The study is ongoing for overall survival FU. METHODS: Postmenopausal pts w/ ER+/HER2- ABC and no prior systemic therapy in the ABC setting were randomized 2:1 to P (125 mg/d) + L (2.5 mg QD) or placebo (PBO) + L. Key endpoints: investigator-assessed PFS and safety. Median PFS (mPFS) was estimated (intent-to-treat population). RESULTS: 666 pts (444, P+L; 222, PBO+L) were enrolled. Arms were well balanced: visceral (48%)/nonvisceral (52%) disease and prior ET (56%)/no prior ET (44%). After a median FU of 38 mo w/ P+L and 37 mo w/ PBO+L, mPFS was 27.6 and 14.5 mo, respectively, in the overall population (HR=0.56, P<.0001; Table). TABLE. mPFS overall and by relevant subgroupsP+LPBO+LP+L vs PBO+LmPFS, mo (95% CI)mPFS, mo (95% CI)HR (95% CI)P* Overall27.6 (22.4–30.3)14.5 (12.3–17.1)0.56 (0.46–0.69)<.0001 Measurable disease23.7 (19.3–27.6)14.5 (12.3–18.5)0.63 (0.50–0.79)<.0001 Nonmeasurable disease36.2 (27.6?NE)16.5 (8.3–19.6)0.39 (0.25–0.60)<.0001 Visceral19.3 (16.4–24.2)12.3 (8.4–16.4)0.62 (0.47–0.81)<.0005 Nonvisceral35.9 (27.7–NE)17.0 (13.8–24.8)0.50 (0.37–0.67)<.0001 Bone only†36.2 (27.6–NE)11.2 (8.2–22.0)0.41 (0.26–0.63)<.0001 Not bone only24.2 (19.4–27.7)14.5 (12.9–18.5)0.62 (0.50–0.78)<.0001 De novo metastatic27.9 (22.1–33.4)22.0 (13.9–27.4)0.61 (0.44–0.85)<.005 Prior ET24.2 (18.8–27.6)11.2 (8.4–14.5)0.54 (0.42–0.71)<.0001 No prior ET30.3 (24.5–35.7)21.9 (15.9–27.4)0.59 (0.43–0.80)<.0005 Nonvisceral36.2 (27.9–NE)27.6 (19.1–35.6)0.59 (0.38–0.92)<.01 Visceral23.7 (16.8–30.3)13.9 (10.2–22.2)0.55 (0.36–0.85)<.005 Disease sites130.4 (24.8–NE)16.5 (11.0–22.1)0.52 (0.36–0.75)<.0005228.1 (19.4–NE)16.3 (11.0–27.4)0.57 (0.37–0.89)<.01323.7 (19.2–27.6)13.8 (8.8–17.0)0.61 (0.46–0.82)<.0005NE=not estimable. *Not adjusted for multiple analyses; 1-sided P values. †Per tumor site. All subgroups benefited from addition of P to L. Notably, pts w/ low disease burden (bone only, nonvisceral disease, few disease sites) derived significant PFS benefit, including those w/ both nonvisceral disease and no prior ET (mPFS, 36.2 vs 27.6 mo; HR=0.59, P<.01). Importantly, median time from randomization to start of 2nd subsequent systemic anticancer therapy was 39 vs 29 mo for P+L vs PBO+L (HR=0.72, P<.005). There were no new safety signals w/ longer FU. CONCLUSIONS: This is the longest FU of a phase 3 study of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor for ABC. P+L continues to consistently improve PFS vs PBO+L across all subgroups while toxicity remains manageable; notably P+L delays time to starting 2nd subsequent anticancer therapies by 10 mo. Pts w/ low disease burden or sensitivity to ET alone had PFS >3 y (significant vs PBO+L), demonstrating the clinical benefit of P+ET. These data confirm P+L should be a 1L therapy option for pts w/ HR+/HER2- ABC. Funding: Pfizer Citation Format: Rugo HS, Finn RS, Dieras V, Ettl J, Lipatov O, Joy A, Harbeck N, Castrellon A, Lu DR, Mori A, Gauthier ER, Huang C, Gelmon KA, Slamon DJ. Palbociclib (PAL) + letrozole (LET) as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC): Efficacy and safety updates with longer follow-up across patient subgroups [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-03.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,011 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».