MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P5-21-03: Palbociclib (PAL) + letrozole (LET) as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC): Efficacy and safety updates with longer follow-up across patient subgroups

2018· article· en· W2792282698 on OpenAlexaff
HS Rugo, RS Finn, Véronique Dièras, Johannes Ettl, Oleg Lipatov, Anil A. Joy, Nadia Harbeck, Aurelio Castrellon, DR Lu, A. Mori, ER Gauthier, Cen Huang, KA Gelmon, DJ Slamon

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalbociclibMedicineInternal medicinePopulationProgression-free survivalBreast cancerEstrogen receptorMetastatic breast cancerLetrozoleClinical endpointCancerGynecologyGastroenterologyOncologyRandomized controlled trialOverall survivalTamoxifen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Endocrine therapy (ET) has been the primary first-line (1L) therapy for ER+ ABC. In the PALOMA-2 study (NCT01740427), PAL (P)+LET (L) significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; HR=0.58, P<.001) after a median 23 mo follow-up (FU) (Finn et al. NEJM 2016). Here we report more mature PFS overall and in subgroups, with (w/) longer FU. The study is ongoing for overall survival FU. METHODS: Postmenopausal pts w/ ER+/HER2- ABC and no prior systemic therapy in the ABC setting were randomized 2:1 to P (125 mg/d) + L (2.5 mg QD) or placebo (PBO) + L. Key endpoints: investigator-assessed PFS and safety. Median PFS (mPFS) was estimated (intent-to-treat population). RESULTS: 666 pts (444, P+L; 222, PBO+L) were enrolled. Arms were well balanced: visceral (48%)/nonvisceral (52%) disease and prior ET (56%)/no prior ET (44%). After a median FU of 38 mo w/ P+L and 37 mo w/ PBO+L, mPFS was 27.6 and 14.5 mo, respectively, in the overall population (HR=0.56, P<.0001; Table). TABLE. mPFS overall and by relevant subgroupsP+LPBO+LP+L vs PBO+LmPFS, mo (95% CI)mPFS, mo (95% CI)HR (95% CI)P* Overall27.6 (22.4–30.3)14.5 (12.3–17.1)0.56 (0.46–0.69)<.0001 Measurable disease23.7 (19.3–27.6)14.5 (12.3–18.5)0.63 (0.50–0.79)<.0001 Nonmeasurable disease36.2 (27.6?NE)16.5 (8.3–19.6)0.39 (0.25–0.60)<.0001 Visceral19.3 (16.4–24.2)12.3 (8.4–16.4)0.62 (0.47–0.81)<.0005 Nonvisceral35.9 (27.7–NE)17.0 (13.8–24.8)0.50 (0.37–0.67)<.0001 Bone only†36.2 (27.6–NE)11.2 (8.2–22.0)0.41 (0.26–0.63)<.0001 Not bone only24.2 (19.4–27.7)14.5 (12.9–18.5)0.62 (0.50–0.78)<.0001 De novo metastatic27.9 (22.1–33.4)22.0 (13.9–27.4)0.61 (0.44–0.85)<.005 Prior ET24.2 (18.8–27.6)11.2 (8.4–14.5)0.54 (0.42–0.71)<.0001 No prior ET30.3 (24.5–35.7)21.9 (15.9–27.4)0.59 (0.43–0.80)<.0005 Nonvisceral36.2 (27.9–NE)27.6 (19.1–35.6)0.59 (0.38–0.92)<.01 Visceral23.7 (16.8–30.3)13.9 (10.2–22.2)0.55 (0.36–0.85)<.005 Disease sites130.4 (24.8–NE)16.5 (11.0–22.1)0.52 (0.36–0.75)<.0005228.1 (19.4–NE)16.3 (11.0–27.4)0.57 (0.37–0.89)<.01323.7 (19.2–27.6)13.8 (8.8–17.0)0.61 (0.46–0.82)<.0005NE=not estimable. *Not adjusted for multiple analyses; 1-sided P values. †Per tumor site. All subgroups benefited from addition of P to L. Notably, pts w/ low disease burden (bone only, nonvisceral disease, few disease sites) derived significant PFS benefit, including those w/ both nonvisceral disease and no prior ET (mPFS, 36.2 vs 27.6 mo; HR=0.59, P<.01). Importantly, median time from randomization to start of 2nd subsequent systemic anticancer therapy was 39 vs 29 mo for P+L vs PBO+L (HR=0.72, P<.005). There were no new safety signals w/ longer FU. CONCLUSIONS: This is the longest FU of a phase 3 study of a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor for ABC. P+L continues to consistently improve PFS vs PBO+L across all subgroups while toxicity remains manageable; notably P+L delays time to starting 2nd subsequent anticancer therapies by 10 mo. Pts w/ low disease burden or sensitivity to ET alone had PFS >3 y (significant vs PBO+L), demonstrating the clinical benefit of P+ET. These data confirm P+L should be a 1L therapy option for pts w/ HR+/HER2- ABC. Funding: Pfizer Citation Format: Rugo HS, Finn RS, Dieras V, Ettl J, Lipatov O, Joy A, Harbeck N, Castrellon A, Lu DR, Mori A, Gauthier ER, Huang C, Gelmon KA, Slamon DJ. Palbociclib (PAL) + letrozole (LET) as first-line therapy in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC): Efficacy and safety updates with longer follow-up across patient subgroups [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-21-03.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207