MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2792787884 · doi:10.1215/07402775-4373494

In a Lonely Place

2017· article· en· W2792787884 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Okalik

Notice bibliographique

RevueWorld Policy Journal · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLegislative assemblyLegislaturePopulationPolitical scienceCabinet (room)Opposition (politics)Public administrationGeographyLawSociologyArchaeologyPoliticsDemography

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Paul Okalik doesn’t shy away from public spectacle. In late 2015, while Canadian Minister of the Environment Leona Aglukkaq was speaking at a forum, Okalik—at the time Minister of Health and Justice for the northern territory of Nunavut—was seen performatively reading a newspaper. The previous year, Aglukkaq, a Conservative, had been spotted doing the same at a hearing where Liberal opposition members were testifying about food insecurity in Nunavut.Then, in 2016, Okalik stepped down from his position in the Nunavut cabinet. Citing his own history with alcoholism, he announced to the regional legislature that he could not support a measure to permit alcohol sales in the territory without first establishing addiction treatment programs.Nunavut became a territory in 1999, splitting from the Northwest Territories after a long series of negotiations between Inuit leaders and Ottawa. (Canada’s three territories receive their authority from the federal government, while its 10 provinces have powers enshrined in the Constitution.) The Inuit now make up more than 80 percent of Nunavut’s population. The sparsely populated territory is governed by a legislative assembly and led by a premier. Okalik, who was born in an Inuit hamlet on Baffin Island, was Nunavut’s first premier, a position he held until 2008. He has served in various offices since then, most recently as a representative of Iqaluit, Nunavut’s capital. In October, he lost his seat to former Iqaluit mayor Elisapee Sheutiapik.Now 18 years into Inuit self-rule, Nunavut’s politicians still grapple with a budget largely reliant on federal funding. Shortly after the 2017 elections, World Policy Journal managing editor Laurel Jarombek spoke with Okalik about this period of transition for Canada’s Inuit—a people who, after their traditional ways of life were disrupted by assimilationist national policies, are now developing new methods of governance. The following has been adapted from their conversation.Prior to the 1999 agreement, the Inuit had been pretty much left behind. We had been governed by the Northwest Territories and Ottawa, and it was a challenge to bring attention to the issues we faced in our homeland. We established our own territory to focus on our priorities—to promote our language and to have a meaningful role in government. We used our land claims agreement, a treaty negotiated with the national government in the 80s and 90s, to push for self-governance.When I returned to Nunavut after studying government and the law, the first elections were gearing up, and I was convinced to run for office. I wanted to do what I could for my territory.Today, almost 20 years later, issues like low living standards and education are still outstanding. The Inuit started with a totally different economic system that didn’t rely on money; it was focused on survival and food gathering. That lasted until around the time I was born, in the early 1960s, and after that the Inuit were relocated to government-made settlements. So we never had a monetary system with which to save and create wealth, and we switched from a hunter-gatherer society to today’s society without any real transitional period. We want to retain our culture, and at the same time acquire the tools to move forward.We want to have the same educational standards as anywhere in the country. We can’t sustain our current cycle of being uneducated, living in public housing, and relying on welfare. It’s not an option. We were once an independent, sovereign society, with our own systems for governance and living. And we can do that again. But for the past decade, we have seen the 15 or 16 percent of our population that is not Inuit govern our territory through bureaucracy—they hold the most powerful and senior positions. There are some bright, young, university-educated Inuit who put their names forward in this last election, but they were rebuffed. There’s a mentality—which must change—that educated Inuit are viewed as “less Inuit” than non-educated Inuit, and that if you’re white, you’re superior.As we rebuild our society, the national government needs to focus on supporting our communities. The current administration, under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, has been a refreshing change. I remember when past governments focused on dividing and conquering Aboriginal peoples in our country. Through actions such as the recent amendments to the Indian Act, this government has shown that it is focused on improving relations and working with all Aboriginal citizens. Hopefully they’ll stay in power for a while longer, as there’s still much more work to do. The most encouraging sign I see is the number of students trying to advance. Once one generation has succeeded in breaking the barrier, it allows the generation that follows to do better.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,534
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0100,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,073
Tête enseignante GPT0,484
Écart entre enseignants0,411 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueWorld Policy JournalMême sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207