Practical tips for paediatricians: Assessment and management of young children with iron deficiency
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Iron deficiency (ID) peaks in prevalence in early childhood, 1 to 3 years of age. Studies in Canadian children suggest a prevalence of 12% or higher for nonanemic ID, and a prevalence of 1.5% or higher for ID anemia (1). ID is considered ‘an inadequately addressed and significant public health problem among Canadian infants and children’ (1). ID in infancy is associated with neuro-cognitive impairments. Long-term follow-up of children with ID in infancy to 25 years of age shows that these deficits persist, and include cognitive impairments and functional impairments such as noncompletion of secondary school and poor emotional health (2). Animal studies confirm impairments in memory and cognition. Several studies have identified key risk factors for ID in young children aged 1 to 3 years. Practitioners can identify these by history and physical examination. These include: prematurity or low birth weight, weaning to noniron fortified foods, introduction of cow’s milk before 9 to 12 months, bottle use beyond 12 months of age, cow’s milk consumption more than 500 mL per day, breastfeeding beyond 12 to 15 months without iron supplementation, meat and meat alternative consumption less than twice per day, overweight or obese (3). There are many laboratory indices of iron status, and practitioners may find it challenging to select the most informative laboratory test. A systematic review of studies in adults, comparing several laboratory tests to bone marrow aspirate (gold standard) concluded that serum ferritin has the highest diagnostic accuracy and should therefore be the ‘only blood test ordered’ (4). Mean corpuscular volume, which is routinely available with the complete blood count, was also found to be a useful test when less than 70 fL, but not as accurate as serum ferritin (4). For children, there are little data to establish a link between the serum ferritin cut-off value and a gold standard (such as bone marrow aspirate) or optimal health outcomes. Future studies should examine the relationship between serum ferritin and developmental outcomes. Furthermore, laboratory reference intervals for serum ferritin are very wide and may not be informative for determining whether or not a young child has ID. A recent study in Canadian children aged 1 to 3 years examined the relationship between hemoglobin and serum ferritin; this analysis suggests that for this age group the optimal hemoglobin is more than 120 g/L (based on the fact that hemoglobin peaks at that level) which is usually associated with a serum ferritin >18 μg/L (5). As serum ferritin is an acute phase reactant, practitioners should concurrently measure C-reactive protein. If the C-reactive protein is elevated, the serum ferritin level may be falsely elevated and should be interpreted with caution. There are many oral iron preparations and brand names, from which practitioners must select the most effective with the least adverse effects. Many oral iron supplements are over-the- counter natural health products which have a separate regulatory system from prescription drugs. The recommended dose is 2 to 6 mg/kg/day of elemental iron, which may be given once daily, or divided into two or three daily doses, for a duration of 3 to 6 months (6). Common forms of iron include ferrous and ferric iron salts. Ferrous iron salts are the most commonly used iron preparations (6). Ferrous sulfate and ferrous fumarate are available in liquid forms, with brand names including Fer-In-Sol® (ferrous sulfate) and Palafer® (ferrous fumarate). More recently, ferric iron salts mixed with a saccharide and water has led to the production of polysaccharide iron complex. Brand names include NovaFerrum® (a liquid) and FeraMAX® (a powder). A 2017 publication reported on a trial that randomized young children aged 9 to 48 months with nutritional ID anemia to a 12-week course of ferrous sulfate or polysaccharide iron complex (6). While children in both groups demonstrated improved hemoglobin and serum ferritin, children receiving ferrous sulfate had significantly greater improvements, and a larger proportion with complete resolution of ID anemia (29% versus 6%) (6). A significant proportion of children in both groups had persistent ID at 12 weeks (6). There were more reports of diarrhea in the polysaccharide iron complex group than in the ferrous sulfate group (6). In young children 1 to 3 years of age, practitioners should: - Assess clinical risk factors for ID - In children at risk, measure hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, serum ferritin and C-reactive protein - If ID, select an iron product that is the most effective with the least adverse effects (typically a ferrous salt) - Treat ID for at least 12 weeks followed by repeat laboratory assessment to determine if treatment needs to continue, aiming for a hemoglobin >120 g/L and serum ferritin >18 µg/L Funding sources: The Pediatric Outcomes Research Team (PORT) is supported by a grant from the Hospital for Sick Children Foundation. Disclosures: PCP received a grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for an ongoing trial of iron supplementation in young children with iron deficiency (FRN # 115059). Mead Johnson Nutrition (MJN) supplies Fer-In-Sol® drops in-kind for this investigator-initiated trial. CIHR and MJN had no role in the preparation of this manuscript. PCP reports grants from Hospital for Sick Children Foundation during the conduct of the study; grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research; nonfinancial support from Mead Johnson Nutrition outside the submitted work; and previously received grants for completed investigator-initiated studies from Danone Institute of Canada (2002 to 2004 and 2006 to 2009), Dairy Farmers of Ontario (2008 to 2010) and Dairy Farmers of Canada (2011 to 2013). These grants did not support this work. Institution where the work originated – Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. Ethics board – Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».