Practical tips for paediatricians: Assessment and management of young children with iron deficiency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Iron deficiency (ID) peaks in prevalence in early childhood, 1 to 3 years of age. Studies in Canadian children suggest a prevalence of 12% or higher for nonanemic ID, and a prevalence of 1.5% or higher for ID anemia (1). ID is considered ‘an inadequately addressed and significant public health problem among Canadian infants and children’ (1). ID in infancy is associated with neuro-cognitive impairments. Long-term follow-up of children with ID in infancy to 25 years of age shows that these deficits persist, and include cognitive impairments and functional impairments such as noncompletion of secondary school and poor emotional health (2). Animal studies confirm impairments in memory and cognition. Several studies have identified key risk factors for ID in young children aged 1 to 3 years. Practitioners can identify these by history and physical examination. These include: prematurity or low birth weight, weaning to noniron fortified foods, introduction of cow’s milk before 9 to 12 months, bottle use beyond 12 months of age, cow’s milk consumption more than 500 mL per day, breastfeeding beyond 12 to 15 months without iron supplementation, meat and meat alternative consumption less than twice per day, overweight or obese (3). There are many laboratory indices of iron status, and practitioners may find it challenging to select the most informative laboratory test. A systematic review of studies in adults, comparing several laboratory tests to bone marrow aspirate (gold standard) concluded that serum ferritin has the highest diagnostic accuracy and should therefore be the ‘only blood test ordered’ (4). Mean corpuscular volume, which is routinely available with the complete blood count, was also found to be a useful test when less than 70 fL, but not as accurate as serum ferritin (4). For children, there are little data to establish a link between the serum ferritin cut-off value and a gold standard (such as bone marrow aspirate) or optimal health outcomes. Future studies should examine the relationship between serum ferritin and developmental outcomes. Furthermore, laboratory reference intervals for serum ferritin are very wide and may not be informative for determining whether or not a young child has ID. A recent study in Canadian children aged 1 to 3 years examined the relationship between hemoglobin and serum ferritin; this analysis suggests that for this age group the optimal hemoglobin is more than 120 g/L (based on the fact that hemoglobin peaks at that level) which is usually associated with a serum ferritin >18 μg/L (5). As serum ferritin is an acute phase reactant, practitioners should concurrently measure C-reactive protein. If the C-reactive protein is elevated, the serum ferritin level may be falsely elevated and should be interpreted with caution. There are many oral iron preparations and brand names, from which practitioners must select the most effective with the least adverse effects. Many oral iron supplements are over-the- counter natural health products which have a separate regulatory system from prescription drugs. The recommended dose is 2 to 6 mg/kg/day of elemental iron, which may be given once daily, or divided into two or three daily doses, for a duration of 3 to 6 months (6). Common forms of iron include ferrous and ferric iron salts. Ferrous iron salts are the most commonly used iron preparations (6). Ferrous sulfate and ferrous fumarate are available in liquid forms, with brand names including Fer-In-Sol® (ferrous sulfate) and Palafer® (ferrous fumarate). More recently, ferric iron salts mixed with a saccharide and water has led to the production of polysaccharide iron complex. Brand names include NovaFerrum® (a liquid) and FeraMAX® (a powder). A 2017 publication reported on a trial that randomized young children aged 9 to 48 months with nutritional ID anemia to a 12-week course of ferrous sulfate or polysaccharide iron complex (6). While children in both groups demonstrated improved hemoglobin and serum ferritin, children receiving ferrous sulfate had significantly greater improvements, and a larger proportion with complete resolution of ID anemia (29% versus 6%) (6). A significant proportion of children in both groups had persistent ID at 12 weeks (6). There were more reports of diarrhea in the polysaccharide iron complex group than in the ferrous sulfate group (6). In young children 1 to 3 years of age, practitioners should: - Assess clinical risk factors for ID - In children at risk, measure hemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, serum ferritin and C-reactive protein - If ID, select an iron product that is the most effective with the least adverse effects (typically a ferrous salt) - Treat ID for at least 12 weeks followed by repeat laboratory assessment to determine if treatment needs to continue, aiming for a hemoglobin >120 g/L and serum ferritin >18 µg/L Funding sources: The Pediatric Outcomes Research Team (PORT) is supported by a grant from the Hospital for Sick Children Foundation. Disclosures: PCP received a grant from Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) for an ongoing trial of iron supplementation in young children with iron deficiency (FRN # 115059). Mead Johnson Nutrition (MJN) supplies Fer-In-Sol® drops in-kind for this investigator-initiated trial. CIHR and MJN had no role in the preparation of this manuscript. PCP reports grants from Hospital for Sick Children Foundation during the conduct of the study; grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research; nonfinancial support from Mead Johnson Nutrition outside the submitted work; and previously received grants for completed investigator-initiated studies from Danone Institute of Canada (2002 to 2004 and 2006 to 2009), Dairy Farmers of Ontario (2008 to 2010) and Dairy Farmers of Canada (2011 to 2013). These grants did not support this work. Institution where the work originated – Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. Ethics board – Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".