245 Work matters: a UK-wide survey of adults with rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis on the impact of their disease on work
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: 10 years ago, the National Rheumatoid Arthritis Society (NRAS) ran a survey and found that people with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are less likely to be in employment than the general population, and that there are significant barriers to work. To understand how this situation has changed over the last 10 years, NRAS surveyed over 1,500 people with RA to understand their experiences in June 2017 to July 2017. Methods: NRAS worked with the University of Manchester (UoM) to develop open and closed questions to explore the current state of employment of people with RA, as well as barriers to remaining in and returning to employment. The survey was developed jointly with UoM and contained validated questionnaires on absenteeism and presenteeism. The survey was distributed by NRAS to its members through email and non-members through social media. Results: 63.3% of people surveyed were in employment, an increase from 2007 when this figure was at 54.8%. However, a significant number of people were concerned about the possibility of them remaining in the job if there were any changes to the nature of the work. Participants commented on the challenges and advantages of work, with the primary advantages being financial security, sense of purpose and enjoyment, and the employer/working environment. However, many of the challenges barriers to work included the role being too demanding, RA symptoms, lack of reasonable adjustments, the commute, and the lack of an understanding employer/colleagues. Almost 40% of participants stated that their employers did not understand the disease and that help that was not available for both employers and employees. Nearly half of all respondents had to use annual leave in order to deal with their RA, with this being just one example of how employers had breached the Equality Act 2010. The survey also found that low numbers of people claimed benefits with Disability Living Allowance and/or Personal Independence Payments and Blue Badge being the most commonly claimed. Many participants had co-morbidities, with particularly high numbers of people reporting mental health issues.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».