First Report of Grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus in grapevine in Germany
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus (GRVFV) is a tentative member of the genus Marafivirus in the family Tymoviridae. It was described for the first time on a Greek grapevine (Vitis rupestris) with symptoms of chlorotic discolorations of leaf veins (El Beaino et al. 2001). Since then, the virus has also been reported in the United States, Canada, Uruguay, Italy, Spain, the Czech Republic, China, and most recently Switzerland, New Zealand, and Korea (Blouin et al. 2017; Cho et al. 2018; Reynard et al. 2017). In September 2017, a grapevine sample from cultivar Syrah from a vineyard from the Rhineland-Palatinate area in Germany was analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. The sequencing library was prepared using the Ribo-Zero Plant Leaf Kit (Illumina) for ribodepletion followed by the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina). The sample was sequenced (2 × 75 nt) on Illumina Nextseq 500 platform (Liege University). After quality control and elimination of duplicated reads, the 4,521,573 reads were mapped on each of the six whole-genome sequences of GRVFV available in the NCBI database (GenBank accession nos. KY513701, KY513702, MF000325, MF000326, AY706994, and KX828705) using the de novo software SPADES as a plugin in Geneious version 10.1.2. A total of 688 reads mapped to the reference genomes. The closest isolate was KY513702 with a coverage of 6,036 bases (corresponding to 89.5% of genome) scattered along the genome and a pairwise identity of 90.5%. Bioinformatic analysis of the remaining contigs showed the presence of grapevine rupestris stem pitting associated virus, grapevine yellow speckle viroid-1, and hop stunt viroid. The presence of GRVFV in the German vineyards was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In a first set of RT-PCR using the previously reported primers GRVFV_6156F (5′-ACTCWCYATCCCCTTCCAGT-3′) and GRVFV_6600R (5′-GCTGACCATGCCACGAATCA-3′) (Reynard et al. 2017) generating a 445 nucleotide amplification product, the expected product was successfully amplified in three out of 80 randomly collected samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic grapevines (two grapevines variety Riesling infected with grapevine fanleaf virus, and the Syrah grapevine, respectively) from different grapevine growing areas in the Rhineland-Palatinate area. The PCR products were cloned and sequenced. The three amplicons shared the same sequence (GenBank accession no. MH131693). BLASTn analysis of the resulting sequences confirmed the presence of the virus, 89% identity being found with the corresponding sequence of the Chass isolate of GRVFV (Reynard et al. 2017). To prevent putative false negative results related to the genetic diversity of the GRVFV, new primers specific to the German isolates (GRVFV-F, 5′-CGCAGCCTCCACCACTCTGAAG-3′; GRVFV-R, 5′-CAGGTAGCCCACAGAGGAC-3′) were designed from the sequences of the PCR products. The expected RT-PCR product of 286 bp was found in 20 out of the 80 samples, from both symptomatic (grapevines variety Riesling with fanleaf disease infected with grapevine fanleaf virus, varieties Dornfelder and Pinot Gris showing stunted growth symptoms of unknown etiology) and asymptomatic grapevines (grapevine varieties Riesling, Dornfelder, and Pinot Gris). It is therefore likely that the symptoms observed in these symptomatic grapevines are owing to other viruses or pathogens or to their interaction with the GRVFV. To our knowledge, this is the first report of GRVFV in Germany.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».