MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2800395171 · doi:10.1094/pdis-03-18-0533-pdn

First Report of Grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus in grapevine in Germany

2018· article· en· W2800395171 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Samia Daldoul, Sébastien Massart, Ana Belén Ruiz-García, Antonio Olmos, Thierry Wetzel

Bibliographic record

VenuePlant Disease · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology
KeywordsBiologyVitis viniferaBotanyPlant virusVirusVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Grapevine rupestris vein feathering virus (GRVFV) is a tentative member of the genus Marafivirus in the family Tymoviridae. It was described for the first time on a Greek grapevine (Vitis rupestris) with symptoms of chlorotic discolorations of leaf veins (El Beaino et al. 2001). Since then, the virus has also been reported in the United States, Canada, Uruguay, Italy, Spain, the Czech Republic, China, and most recently Switzerland, New Zealand, and Korea (Blouin et al. 2017; Cho et al. 2018; Reynard et al. 2017). In September 2017, a grapevine sample from cultivar Syrah from a vineyard from the Rhineland-Palatinate area in Germany was analyzed by high-throughput sequencing. The sequencing library was prepared using the Ribo-Zero Plant Leaf Kit (Illumina) for ribodepletion followed by the TruSeq Stranded Total RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina). The sample was sequenced (2 × 75 nt) on Illumina Nextseq 500 platform (Liege University). After quality control and elimination of duplicated reads, the 4,521,573 reads were mapped on each of the six whole-genome sequences of GRVFV available in the NCBI database (GenBank accession nos. KY513701, KY513702, MF000325, MF000326, AY706994, and KX828705) using the de novo software SPADES as a plugin in Geneious version 10.1.2. A total of 688 reads mapped to the reference genomes. The closest isolate was KY513702 with a coverage of 6,036 bases (corresponding to 89.5% of genome) scattered along the genome and a pairwise identity of 90.5%. Bioinformatic analysis of the remaining contigs showed the presence of grapevine rupestris stem pitting associated virus, grapevine yellow speckle viroid-1, and hop stunt viroid. The presence of GRVFV in the German vineyards was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In a first set of RT-PCR using the previously reported primers GRVFV_6156F (5′-ACTCWCYATCCCCTTCCAGT-3′) and GRVFV_6600R (5′-GCTGACCATGCCACGAATCA-3′) (Reynard et al. 2017) generating a 445 nucleotide amplification product, the expected product was successfully amplified in three out of 80 randomly collected samples from symptomatic and asymptomatic grapevines (two grapevines variety Riesling infected with grapevine fanleaf virus, and the Syrah grapevine, respectively) from different grapevine growing areas in the Rhineland-Palatinate area. The PCR products were cloned and sequenced. The three amplicons shared the same sequence (GenBank accession no. MH131693). BLASTn analysis of the resulting sequences confirmed the presence of the virus, 89% identity being found with the corresponding sequence of the Chass isolate of GRVFV (Reynard et al. 2017). To prevent putative false negative results related to the genetic diversity of the GRVFV, new primers specific to the German isolates (GRVFV-F, 5′-CGCAGCCTCCACCACTCTGAAG-3′; GRVFV-R, 5′-CAGGTAGCCCACAGAGGAC-3′) were designed from the sequences of the PCR products. The expected RT-PCR product of 286 bp was found in 20 out of the 80 samples, from both symptomatic (grapevines variety Riesling with fanleaf disease infected with grapevine fanleaf virus, varieties Dornfelder and Pinot Gris showing stunted growth symptoms of unknown etiology) and asymptomatic grapevines (grapevine varieties Riesling, Dornfelder, and Pinot Gris). It is therefore likely that the symptoms observed in these symptomatic grapevines are owing to other viruses or pathogens or to their interaction with the GRVFV. To our knowledge, this is the first report of GRVFV in Germany.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.860

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlant DiseaseSame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207