زمین شناسی، پتروگرافی، دگرسانی، کانی سازی و پتروژنز توده های نفوذی در محدوده اکتشافی همچ، جنوب غرب بیرجند
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction The Hamech prospect area is located in the eastern Iran, 85 kilometers southwest of Birjand. The study area coordinates between 58¬¬˚¬53΄¬00 ˝ to 59˚¬00΄¬00˝ latitude and 32˚¬22΄¬30 ˝ to 32˚¬26΄¬00˝ longitude. Due to the high volume of magmatism and the presence of geo-structure special condition in the Lut Block at a different time, a variety of metal (copper, lead, zinc, gold, etc.) and non-metallic mineralization has been formed (Karimpour et al., 2012). The studied area (Hamech) includes Paleocene-Eocene igneous outcrops which contain a wide range of subvolcanic bodies (diorite to monzonite porphyry) associated with mafic intrusives, volcanic units (andesite), volcaniclastic and sedimentary rocks. Material and Methods This study was done in two parts including field and laboratory works. Sampling and structural studies were done during field work. Geological and alteration maps for the study area were also prepared. 200 thin and 60 polished sections for petrographic purpose were studied. The number of 200 thin sections and 60 polished sections were prepared and studied in order to investigate petrography and mineralogy. Major oxides (XRF method- East Amethyst Laboratory in Mashhad), rare earth elements and trace (ICP-MS method-ACME Laboratory in Vancouver, Canada) elements were analyzed for 13 samples that included subvolcanic units and intrusive bodies. Data processing and geological and alteration mapping is done by the GCD.kit and Arcgis software. Discussion and Results Based on lab work and XRF analysis, the rocks in the area are composed of intrusive-subvolcanic bodies and volcanic rocks (andesite, trachyandesite and dacite) together with volcano-classic and sedimentary rocks. Also, alteration zones consist of a variety of argillic, silicified, quartz-sericite-pyrite (QSP), propylitic and carbonate. Igneous rock textures are mainly porphyritic for sub-volcanic and granular for intrusive bodies. Phenocrysts mainly consist of plagioclase and hornblende dominated with minor of biotite and pyroxene. XRF studies and output charts show that rocks include monzonite, diorite, gabbro and gabbroic diorite. Intermediate subvolcanic units (monzonite, diorite) and mafic intrusives (gabbro and gabbroic-diorite) are related to high-potassium calc-alkaline (K2O between 2.42 to 4%) and tholeiitic (K2O between 0.15 to 0.27%) series, respectively. Subvolcanic units belong to the I-type granitoid (Chappell and White, 2001). Mantle normalized , trace-element spider diagrams display enrichment in LREE, such as Rb, Sr, K, and Cs, and depletion in HREE, e.g., Nb, Ti, Zr that indicate magma formed in the subduction zone. Nb depletion (less than 6 ppm, between 0.5 to 5.2 ppm) in subvolcanic bodies represents a volcanic arc granitoids (VAG) tectonic setting that is related to the subduction zone (Pearce et al., 1984). Also, this reduction shows that these rocks are derived of oceanic crust (Wilson, 1989). Enrichment in LREE and depletion of HREE with a low (La/Yb)N ratio in the Hamech subvolcanic rocks (6/85 to 8/13) could represent a low degree of mantle partial melting (Wass and Rogers, 1980). Zr/Nb ratio of more than 10 for Hamech rocks (between 21 and 35 for intermediate subvolcanic and 67 to 72 for mafic bodies) indicates that parental magma has minimal crustal contamination (Karimpour et al., 2012). Sr enrichment (between 646 to 1124) and low negative Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* ratio between 0.81 to 1/02) show that plagioclase is rare (or is not present) as residue mineral in the source and melt conditions have been in oxidation state (Tepper et al., 1993). Based on Sm/Yb vs. La/Sm (Shaw, 1970) and Ce/Yb vs. Sm/Yb (Wang et al., 2002) diagrams, parent magma is composed of 1 to 5% spinel-garnet lherzolite partial melting (with small amounts of garnet) at a depth between 65 to 67 km (upper mantle) for subvolcanic units and 5 to 20% spinel lherzolite partial melting (depletion mantle-NMORB) with a depth of less than 55 km for mafic bodies. Suitable tectonic setting, existence of subvolcanic units with intermediate composition, magnetic activity with the nature of calc-alkaline and oxidants, data from major and REE studies, mineralization as disseminated and veinlets with high secondary iron oxides in surface show suitable conditions of porphyry and epithermal mineralization in the Hamech prospect area. References Chappell, B.W. and White, A.J.R., 2001. Two contrasting granite types, 25years later. Australian Journal of Earth Sdiences, 48(4): 489–500. Karimpour, M.H., Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, A., Farmer, L. and Stern, C.R., 2012. Petrogenesis of Granitoids, U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd Petrogenesis of granitoids, U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd isotopic characteristics, and important occurrence of Tertiary mineralization within the Lut block, eastern Iran. Journal of Economic Geology, 4(1): 1–27. (in Persian with English abstract) Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.W. and Tindle, A.G., 1984. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology, 25(4): 956–983. Shaw, D.M., 1970. Trace element fractionation during anataxis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 34(2): 237–243. Tepper, J.H., Nelson, B.K., Bergantz, G.W. and Irving, A.J., 1993. Petrology of the Chilliwack batholith, North Cascades, Washington: generation of calc-alkalinegranitoids by melting of mafic lower crust with variable water fugacity. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 113(3): 333–351. Wang, K., Plank, T., Walker, J.D. and Smith, E.I., 2002. A mantle melting profile across the Basin and Range, SW USA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B1): 5–21. Wass, S.Y. and Rogers, N.W., 1980. Mantle metasomatism- precursor to alkaline continental volcanism. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 44(11): 1811–1823. Wilson, M., 1989. Igneous Petrogenesis. Chapman and Hall, London, 466 pp.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,019 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».