MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801576462 · doi:10.22067/econg.v10i1.62625

زمین شناسی، پتروگرافی، دگرسانی، کانی سازی و پتروژنز توده های نفوذی در محدوده اکتشافی همچ، جنوب غرب بیرجند

2018· article· fa· W2801576462 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
عباس اعتمادی, محمد حسن کریم پور, آزاده ملکزاده شفارودی

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefa
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryLileNuclear chemistryGeochemistryGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction The Hamech prospect area is located in the eastern Iran, 85 kilometers southwest of Birjand. The study area coordinates between 58¬¬˚¬53΄¬00 ˝ to 59˚¬00΄¬00˝ latitude and 32˚¬22΄¬30 ˝ to 32˚¬26΄¬00˝ longitude. Due to the high volume of magmatism and the presence of geo-structure special condition in the Lut Block at a different time, a variety of metal (copper, lead, zinc, gold, etc.) and non-metallic mineralization has been formed (Karimpour et al., 2012). The studied area (Hamech) includes Paleocene-Eocene igneous outcrops which contain a wide range of subvolcanic bodies (diorite to monzonite porphyry) associated with mafic intrusives, volcanic units (andesite), volcaniclastic and sedimentary rocks. Material and Methods This study was done in two parts including field and laboratory works. Sampling and structural studies were done during field work. Geological and alteration maps for the study area were also prepared. 200 thin and 60 polished sections for petrographic purpose were studied. The number of 200 thin sections and 60 polished sections were prepared and studied in order to investigate petrography and mineralogy. Major oxides (XRF method- East Amethyst Laboratory in Mashhad), rare earth elements and trace (ICP-MS method-ACME Laboratory in Vancouver, Canada) elements were analyzed for 13 samples that included subvolcanic units and intrusive bodies. Data processing and geological and alteration mapping is done by the GCD.kit and Arcgis software. Discussion and Results Based on lab work and XRF analysis, the rocks in the area are composed of intrusive-subvolcanic bodies and volcanic rocks (andesite, trachyandesite and dacite) together with volcano-classic and sedimentary rocks. Also, alteration zones consist of a variety of argillic, silicified, quartz-sericite-pyrite (QSP), propylitic and carbonate. Igneous rock textures are mainly porphyritic for sub-volcanic and granular for intrusive bodies. Phenocrysts mainly consist of plagioclase and hornblende dominated with minor of biotite and pyroxene. XRF studies and output charts show that rocks include monzonite, diorite, gabbro and gabbroic diorite. Intermediate subvolcanic units (monzonite, diorite) and mafic intrusives (gabbro and gabbroic-diorite) are related to high-potassium calc-alkaline (K2O between 2.42 to 4%) and tholeiitic (K2O between 0.15 to 0.27%) series, respectively. Subvolcanic units belong to the I-type granitoid (Chappell and White, 2001). Mantle normalized , trace-element spider diagrams display enrichment in LREE, such as Rb, Sr, K, and Cs, and depletion in HREE, e.g., Nb, Ti, Zr that indicate magma formed in the subduction zone. Nb depletion (less than 6 ppm, between 0.5 to 5.2 ppm) in subvolcanic bodies represents a volcanic arc granitoids (VAG) tectonic setting that is related to the subduction zone (Pearce et al., 1984). Also, this reduction shows that these rocks are derived of oceanic crust (Wilson, 1989). Enrichment in LREE and depletion of HREE with a low (La/Yb)N ratio in the Hamech subvolcanic rocks (6/85 to 8/13) could represent a low degree of mantle partial melting (Wass and Rogers, 1980). Zr/Nb ratio of more than 10 for Hamech rocks (between 21 and 35 for intermediate subvolcanic and 67 to 72 for mafic bodies) indicates that parental magma has minimal crustal contamination (Karimpour et al., 2012). Sr enrichment (between 646 to 1124) and low negative Eu anomaly (Eu/Eu* ratio between 0.81 to 1/02) show that plagioclase is rare (or is not present) as residue mineral in the source and melt conditions have been in oxidation state (Tepper et al., 1993). Based on Sm/Yb vs. La/Sm (Shaw, 1970) and Ce/Yb vs. Sm/Yb (Wang et al., 2002) diagrams, parent magma is composed of 1 to 5% spinel-garnet lherzolite partial melting (with small amounts of garnet) at a depth between 65 to 67 km (upper mantle) for subvolcanic units and 5 to 20% spinel lherzolite partial melting (depletion mantle-NMORB) with a depth of less than 55 km for mafic bodies. Suitable tectonic setting, existence of subvolcanic units with intermediate composition, magnetic activity with the nature of calc-alkaline and oxidants, data from major and REE studies, mineralization as disseminated and veinlets with high secondary iron oxides in surface show suitable conditions of porphyry and epithermal mineralization in the Hamech prospect area. References Chappell, B.W. and White, A.J.R., 2001. Two contrasting granite types, 25years later. Australian Journal of Earth Sdiences, 48(4): 489–500. Karimpour, M.H., Malekzadeh Shafaroudi, A., Farmer, L. and Stern, C.R., 2012. Petrogenesis of Granitoids, U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd Petrogenesis of granitoids, U-Pb zircon geochronology, Sr-Nd isotopic characteristics, and important occurrence of Tertiary mineralization within the Lut block, eastern Iran. Journal of Economic Geology, 4(1): 1–27. (in Persian with English abstract) Pearce, J.A., Harris, N.W. and Tindle, A.G., 1984. Trace element discrimination diagrams for the tectonic interpretation of granitic rocks. Journal of Petrology, 25(4): 956–983. Shaw, D.M., 1970. Trace element fractionation during anataxis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 34(2): 237–243. Tepper, J.H., Nelson, B.K., Bergantz, G.W. and Irving, A.J., 1993. Petrology of the Chilliwack batholith, North Cascades, Washington: generation of calc-alkalinegranitoids by melting of mafic lower crust with variable water fugacity. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 113(3): 333–351. Wang, K., Plank, T., Walker, J.D. and Smith, E.I., 2002. A mantle melting profile across the Basin and Range, SW USA. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 107(B1): 5–21. Wass, S.Y. and Rogers, N.W., 1980. Mantle metasomatism- precursor to alkaline continental volcanism. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 44(11): 1811–1823. Wilson, M., 1989. Igneous Petrogenesis. Chapman and Hall, London, 466 pp.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.350
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0080.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3530.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.232
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicGeochemistry and Elemental AnalysisFrench-language works237,207