MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2801980841 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(18)30055-x

Challenges and opportunities in planetary health for primary care providers

2018· article· en· W2801980841 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Edward Xie, Enrique Barros, Alan Abelsohn, Aírton Tetelbom Stein, Andy Haines

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueClimate Change and Health Impacts
Établissements canadiensUniversity of TorontoToronto General Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPrimary carePrimary health careBusinessMEDLINEHealth careNursingMedicinePolitical scienceFamily medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Primary care providers (PCPs) are trusted to provide a person-centred, comprehensive, and integrated response to health challenges. Through preventive health measures, PCPs also have a responsibility to strengthen the resilience of the communities they serve. Many environmental alterations, including climate change, air pollution, biodiversity loss, freshwater depletion, land use change, and exposures to toxic chemicals, threaten the advances in human health experienced in the past decades. PCPs can be instrumental in helping to address some of the causes and consequences of these environmental alterations.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar Regarding climate change, for example, leadership and action by PCPs can enhance existing efforts to mitigate and adapt to diverse effects, producing many benefits for patients, health-care systems, and planetary health in general. The health effects of climate change can be categorised as direct (eg, heat stroke), indirect (eg, mental illness after experiencing floods), or mediated through societal systems (eg, population displacement after drought or conflict).2Smith KR Woodward A Campbell-Lendrum D et al.Human health: impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits.in: Field CB Barros VR Dokken DJ Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA2014: 709-754Google Scholar, 3Kelley CP Mohtadi S Cane MA Seager R Kushnir Y Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 3241-3246Crossref PubMed Scopus (550) Google Scholar Social determinants of health affect the vulnerability of populations to climate change and their capacity to adapt. Policies that address these determinants and the drivers of climate change span all sectors, including transportation, energy, agriculture, and the economy.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar PCPs can exert influence through their social capital, to support favourable policies and create health co-benefits, with evidence showing that PCPs could earn more trust from the general public than public health experts or government agencies.4Walker R Hassall J Chaplin S Congues J Bajayo R Mason W Health promotion interventions to address climate change using a primary health care approach: a literature review.Health Promot J Austr. 2011; 22: S6-S12Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 5Maibach EW Kreslake JM Roser-Renouf C Rosenthal S Feinberg G Leiserowitz AA Do Americans understand that global warming is harmful to human health? Evidence from a national survey.Ann Glob Health. 2015; 81: 396-409Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar Moreover, PCPs are often opinion leaders and advocates for evidence-based interventions, and they are widely distributed and connected to their communities. Health-related interventions with environmental co-benefits can be provided by PCPs across the spectrum of climate change causes and effects (figure). We divide these actions into four categories that encompass the breadth of practice of PCPs and reflect the diversity of roles that are involved. Aside from treating illness, PCPs can have a major role in health care, promotion, and prevention. They can also make recommendations to individuals for changes in behaviour that have environmental co-benefits. For example, they can recommend increasing physical activity by shifting from motorised to active transport, healthier diets with low environmental impact including little or no red meat and high fruit and vegetable intake, and family planning. With established disease, PCPs may adjust therapies to adapt to environmental stress. For instance, anticipatory guidance and modification of medications (ie, modification of the drug course, dosage, or medication itself) is available to elderly patients during heatwaves. Additionally, since PCPs are often the first to encounter disease, they serve an important surveillance function for vector-borne and other infectious diseases, as suggested by a comparison of neighbouring cities in Brazil.6Roriz-Cruz M Sprinz E Rosset I Goldani L Teixeira MG Dengue and primary care: a tale of two cities.Bull World Health Organ. 2010; 88: 244-245Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar Finally, after climate-related events (eg, floods and storms), PCPs can provide support to reduce physical and mental health effects in affected individuals.7Nahar N Blomstedt Y Wu B Kandarina I Trisnantoro L Kinsman J Increasing the provision of mental health care for vulnerable, disaster-affected people in Bangladesh.BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 708Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar PCPs can also have a role in health system strengthening. They represent a large portion of the worldwide human resource for health care, so they should have an input into the workforce planning for the anticipated worsening of climate-sensitive conditions, such as respiratory illnesses or emerging zoonotic diseases arising from land use and other environmental changes.8Blashki G McMichael T Karoly D Climate change and primary health care.Aust Fam Physician. 2007; 36: 986-989PubMed Google Scholar Their connection to the communities they serve allows PCPs to involve social and environmental determinants of health, instead of taking a purely biomedical approach, to care or increase preparedness for vulnerable populations, for example elderly and homeless people, people with low income, and coastal or drought-prone populations. Moreover, the resilience of the primary health-care infrastructure can be increased to mitigate the health effects of climate change, for example by reducing emissions of climate-altering pollutants through improved energy efficiency or low-carbon sources of energy.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar, 9Nichols A Richardson J Climate change, health and sustainability: a brief survey of primary care trusts in the south west of England.Perspect Public Health. 2011; 131: 82-84Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar PCPs can help introduce planetary health concepts in education and research using training curricula and professional educational materials.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar, 8Blashki G McMichael T Karoly D Climate change and primary health care.Aust Fam Physician. 2007; 36: 986-989PubMed Google Scholar Patients can receive public health education directly from PCPs, and the educational material can be developed with primary care input. In some contexts, policy-makers rely on the expert interpretation of PCPs to inform decisions through briefs, deputations, or other means.10Watts N Adger WN Ayeb-Karlsson S et al.The Lancet Countdown: tracking progress on health and climate change.Lancet. 2017; 389: 1151-1164Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar In research and academia, PCPs can recommend research priorities or engage in investigations regarding population health, such as a recent evaluation of air quality alerts.11Chen H Li Q Kaufman JS et al.Effect of air quality alerts on human health: a regression discontinuity analysis in Toronto, Canada.Lancet Planet Health. 2018; 2: e19-e26Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar Climate changes and other environmental changes can be acknowledged as contributory factors to individual clinical cases or to changes in population health (eg, changes relating to extended allergy seasons, or to the effect of heat stress on risk of death in elderly people). Finally, PCPs can have an important role in advocacy. Health professionals can take part in the social marketing of health information related to environmental change, and advocate for adaptation and mitigation actions.4Walker R Hassall J Chaplin S Congues J Bajayo R Mason W Health promotion interventions to address climate change using a primary health care approach: a literature review.Health Promot J Austr. 2011; 22: S6-S12Crossref PubMed Google Scholar PCPs can also prompt governing bodies to take actions that affect the climate and the environment by highlighting the associated health benefits.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar A divestment from fossil fuels and support for well designed carbon taxes, for instance, could improve overall health and reduce income inequality.12Cuevas S Haines A Health benefits of a carbon tax.Lancet. 2016; 387: 7-9Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar At the professional level, organisations such as the World Organisation of Family Doctors are taking leadership in this form of advocacy.13World Organization of National CollegesAcademies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians EuropePlanetary Health & Primary Health Care.http://www.woncaeurope.org/sites/default/files/news/RC67 - Statement on Planetary Health.pdfDate: 2017Date accessed: February 26, 2018Google Scholar At the local level, PCPs can help lead community intersectoral cooperation, join community action groups, or behave as role models, for example by leading waste reduction and recycling or active travel campaigns. Our framework provides clear parallels between changes in health behaviours (eg, smoking, exercise, nutrition) and climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. As experts in these health behaviours, PCPs can also serve the community as strong promoters of actions that encourage environmental change. The complex and multi-faceted health effects of environmental change require the unique ability of PCPs to combine their legitimacy as knowledge experts with a close professional relationship to the people they treat. We are confident that PCPs can recognise and potentiate their current position as the foundation for health systems by using evidence to protect planetary health. This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com/planetaryhealth on June 29, 2018 This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com/planetaryhealth on June 29, 2018 We declare no competing interests. Correction to Lancet Planet Health 2018; 2: e185–7Xie E, Falceto de Barros E, Abelsohn A, et al. Challenges and opportunities in planetary health for primary care providers. Lancet Plan Health 2018; 2: e185–87—In the figure, “heat loss” in the “health effects” box should read “heat illness”. The references have been renumbered to the correct order. These corrections have been made to the online version as of June 29, 2018. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,820
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,979

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,231
Tête enseignante GPT0,338
Écart entre enseignants0,106 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations80
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Lancet Planetary HealthMême sujetClimate Change and Health ImpactsTravaux en français237 207