MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2801980841 · doi:10.1016/s2542-5196(18)30055-x

Challenges and opportunities in planetary health for primary care providers

2018· article· en· W2801980841 on OpenAlexaffabout
Edward Xie, Enrique Barros, Alan Abelsohn, Aírton Tetelbom Stein, Andy Haines

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary carePrimary health careBusinessMEDLINEHealth careNursingMedicinePolitical scienceFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary care providers (PCPs) are trusted to provide a person-centred, comprehensive, and integrated response to health challenges. Through preventive health measures, PCPs also have a responsibility to strengthen the resilience of the communities they serve. Many environmental alterations, including climate change, air pollution, biodiversity loss, freshwater depletion, land use change, and exposures to toxic chemicals, threaten the advances in human health experienced in the past decades. PCPs can be instrumental in helping to address some of the causes and consequences of these environmental alterations.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar Regarding climate change, for example, leadership and action by PCPs can enhance existing efforts to mitigate and adapt to diverse effects, producing many benefits for patients, health-care systems, and planetary health in general. The health effects of climate change can be categorised as direct (eg, heat stroke), indirect (eg, mental illness after experiencing floods), or mediated through societal systems (eg, population displacement after drought or conflict).2Smith KR Woodward A Campbell-Lendrum D et al.Human health: impacts, adaptation, and co-benefits.in: Field CB Barros VR Dokken DJ Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, USA2014: 709-754Google Scholar, 3Kelley CP Mohtadi S Cane MA Seager R Kushnir Y Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015; 112: 3241-3246Crossref PubMed Scopus (550) Google Scholar Social determinants of health affect the vulnerability of populations to climate change and their capacity to adapt. Policies that address these determinants and the drivers of climate change span all sectors, including transportation, energy, agriculture, and the economy.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar PCPs can exert influence through their social capital, to support favourable policies and create health co-benefits, with evidence showing that PCPs could earn more trust from the general public than public health experts or government agencies.4Walker R Hassall J Chaplin S Congues J Bajayo R Mason W Health promotion interventions to address climate change using a primary health care approach: a literature review.Health Promot J Austr. 2011; 22: S6-S12Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 5Maibach EW Kreslake JM Roser-Renouf C Rosenthal S Feinberg G Leiserowitz AA Do Americans understand that global warming is harmful to human health? Evidence from a national survey.Ann Glob Health. 2015; 81: 396-409Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (55) Google Scholar Moreover, PCPs are often opinion leaders and advocates for evidence-based interventions, and they are widely distributed and connected to their communities. Health-related interventions with environmental co-benefits can be provided by PCPs across the spectrum of climate change causes and effects (figure). We divide these actions into four categories that encompass the breadth of practice of PCPs and reflect the diversity of roles that are involved. Aside from treating illness, PCPs can have a major role in health care, promotion, and prevention. They can also make recommendations to individuals for changes in behaviour that have environmental co-benefits. For example, they can recommend increasing physical activity by shifting from motorised to active transport, healthier diets with low environmental impact including little or no red meat and high fruit and vegetable intake, and family planning. With established disease, PCPs may adjust therapies to adapt to environmental stress. For instance, anticipatory guidance and modification of medications (ie, modification of the drug course, dosage, or medication itself) is available to elderly patients during heatwaves. Additionally, since PCPs are often the first to encounter disease, they serve an important surveillance function for vector-borne and other infectious diseases, as suggested by a comparison of neighbouring cities in Brazil.6Roriz-Cruz M Sprinz E Rosset I Goldani L Teixeira MG Dengue and primary care: a tale of two cities.Bull World Health Organ. 2010; 88: 244-245Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar Finally, after climate-related events (eg, floods and storms), PCPs can provide support to reduce physical and mental health effects in affected individuals.7Nahar N Blomstedt Y Wu B Kandarina I Trisnantoro L Kinsman J Increasing the provision of mental health care for vulnerable, disaster-affected people in Bangladesh.BMC Public Health. 2014; 14: 708Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar PCPs can also have a role in health system strengthening. They represent a large portion of the worldwide human resource for health care, so they should have an input into the workforce planning for the anticipated worsening of climate-sensitive conditions, such as respiratory illnesses or emerging zoonotic diseases arising from land use and other environmental changes.8Blashki G McMichael T Karoly D Climate change and primary health care.Aust Fam Physician. 2007; 36: 986-989PubMed Google Scholar Their connection to the communities they serve allows PCPs to involve social and environmental determinants of health, instead of taking a purely biomedical approach, to care or increase preparedness for vulnerable populations, for example elderly and homeless people, people with low income, and coastal or drought-prone populations. Moreover, the resilience of the primary health-care infrastructure can be increased to mitigate the health effects of climate change, for example by reducing emissions of climate-altering pollutants through improved energy efficiency or low-carbon sources of energy.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar, 9Nichols A Richardson J Climate change, health and sustainability: a brief survey of primary care trusts in the south west of England.Perspect Public Health. 2011; 131: 82-84Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar PCPs can help introduce planetary health concepts in education and research using training curricula and professional educational materials.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar, 8Blashki G McMichael T Karoly D Climate change and primary health care.Aust Fam Physician. 2007; 36: 986-989PubMed Google Scholar Patients can receive public health education directly from PCPs, and the educational material can be developed with primary care input. In some contexts, policy-makers rely on the expert interpretation of PCPs to inform decisions through briefs, deputations, or other means.10Watts N Adger WN Ayeb-Karlsson S et al.The Lancet Countdown: tracking progress on health and climate change.Lancet. 2017; 389: 1151-1164Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (181) Google Scholar In research and academia, PCPs can recommend research priorities or engage in investigations regarding population health, such as a recent evaluation of air quality alerts.11Chen H Li Q Kaufman JS et al.Effect of air quality alerts on human health: a regression discontinuity analysis in Toronto, Canada.Lancet Planet Health. 2018; 2: e19-e26Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (35) Google Scholar Climate changes and other environmental changes can be acknowledged as contributory factors to individual clinical cases or to changes in population health (eg, changes relating to extended allergy seasons, or to the effect of heat stress on risk of death in elderly people). Finally, PCPs can have an important role in advocacy. Health professionals can take part in the social marketing of health information related to environmental change, and advocate for adaptation and mitigation actions.4Walker R Hassall J Chaplin S Congues J Bajayo R Mason W Health promotion interventions to address climate change using a primary health care approach: a literature review.Health Promot J Austr. 2011; 22: S6-S12Crossref PubMed Google Scholar PCPs can also prompt governing bodies to take actions that affect the climate and the environment by highlighting the associated health benefits.1Haines A McMichael AJ Smith KR et al.Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makers.Lancet. 2009; 374: 2104-2114Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (348) Google Scholar A divestment from fossil fuels and support for well designed carbon taxes, for instance, could improve overall health and reduce income inequality.12Cuevas S Haines A Health benefits of a carbon tax.Lancet. 2016; 387: 7-9Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (5) Google Scholar At the professional level, organisations such as the World Organisation of Family Doctors are taking leadership in this form of advocacy.13World Organization of National CollegesAcademies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians EuropePlanetary Health & Primary Health Care.http://www.woncaeurope.org/sites/default/files/news/RC67 - Statement on Planetary Health.pdfDate: 2017Date accessed: February 26, 2018Google Scholar At the local level, PCPs can help lead community intersectoral cooperation, join community action groups, or behave as role models, for example by leading waste reduction and recycling or active travel campaigns. Our framework provides clear parallels between changes in health behaviours (eg, smoking, exercise, nutrition) and climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. As experts in these health behaviours, PCPs can also serve the community as strong promoters of actions that encourage environmental change. The complex and multi-faceted health effects of environmental change require the unique ability of PCPs to combine their legitimacy as knowledge experts with a close professional relationship to the people they treat. We are confident that PCPs can recognise and potentiate their current position as the foundation for health systems by using evidence to protect planetary health. This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com/planetaryhealth on June 29, 2018 This online publication has been corrected. The corrected version first appeared at thelancet.com/planetaryhealth on June 29, 2018 We declare no competing interests. Correction to Lancet Planet Health 2018; 2: e185–7Xie E, Falceto de Barros E, Abelsohn A, et al. Challenges and opportunities in planetary health for primary care providers. Lancet Plan Health 2018; 2: e185–87—In the figure, “heat loss” in the “health effects” box should read “heat illness”. The references have been renumbered to the correct order. These corrections have been made to the online version as of June 29, 2018. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.820
Threshold uncertainty score0.979

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.231
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.106 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations80
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207