0789 Sleepwalking and Sleeptalking in Children: Associations with Emotional/Behavioral Problems and Sleep Quality
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sleepwalking (SW) is a parasomnia involving unusual and complex behaviors initiated during sleep, such as walking, sitting or eating. It has been proposed that sleeptalking (ST) shares similar underlying mechanism with SW. A few studies found associations between these parasomnias and: separation anxiety, hyperactivity-inattention symptoms, as well as environmental factor such as parental divorce. However, the association between ST-SW and psychological symptoms assessed with validated measures in childhood remains to clarify. The aim of this project is to compare emotional/behavioral problems, as well as sleep patterns, in children with and without SW/ST. This project is part of the study, Maternal Adversity Vulnerability and Neurodevelopment (MAVAN)(n=277). Presence of SW,ST, sleep duration, number and duration of night awakenings were assessed with the Children Sleep Habits Questionnaire, and Emotional/behavioral problems were assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) at 4 and 5 years old. Independent sample T-tests were used to assess differences between children with and without SW/ST. At 4 years old, 2.7% of children presented SW and 27.4% ST. At 5 years old, 4.4% of children were sleepwalking and 20.5% sleeptalking. Five-year-old children with SW or ST (or both), had more depressive problems (2.68 ± 2.41 vs 1.67 ± 1.81, p=.001), anxiety problems (9.984 ± 3.36 vs 2.16±=2.18, p<.001), pervasive developmental problems (3.84 ± 2.67 vs 2.68 ± 2.41, p=.001), and oppositional/defiant problems (3.33 ± 2.49 vs 2.60 ± 2.53, p=.04) than children without SW/ST. Similar results were observed at 4 years old. Although children with SW or ST (or both) had more night awakenings (4.45 ± 1.53 vs 3.92 ± 1.36, p=.01) than children without SW/ST, no differences were found in sleep duration and duration of awakenings (p>.05). Children who experienced SW and∕or ST also had more depressive, anxious, pervasive developmental and oppositional/defiant problems than children without SW/ST. While they also showed more nocturnal awakenings, other sleep characteristics were not affected. A better understanding of the mechanisms linking parasomnias and psychological problems could eventually represent a new therapeutic avenue to the treatment of both psychological and sleep problems. Canadian Institute of Health Research, Ludmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».