MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2803059178 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.788

0789 Sleepwalking and Sleeptalking in Children: Associations with Emotional/Behavioral Problems and Sleep Quality

2018· article· en· W2803059178 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christine Laganière, Hélène Gaudreau, Irina Pokhvisneva, Leslie Atkinson, Michael J. Meaney, Marie‐Hélène Pennestri

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHomelessness and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsHôpital Rivière-des-PrairiesToronto Metropolitan UniversityMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleepwalkingParasomniaAnxietyChild Behavior ChecklistCBCLPsychologyPsychopathologySleep disorderSeparation anxiety disorderClinical psychologyPsychiatryGeneralized anxiety disorderInsomnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleepwalking (SW) is a parasomnia involving unusual and complex behaviors initiated during sleep, such as walking, sitting or eating. It has been proposed that sleeptalking (ST) shares similar underlying mechanism with SW. A few studies found associations between these parasomnias and: separation anxiety, hyperactivity-inattention symptoms, as well as environmental factor such as parental divorce. However, the association between ST-SW and psychological symptoms assessed with validated measures in childhood remains to clarify. The aim of this project is to compare emotional/behavioral problems, as well as sleep patterns, in children with and without SW/ST. This project is part of the study, Maternal Adversity Vulnerability and Neurodevelopment (MAVAN)(n=277). Presence of SW,ST, sleep duration, number and duration of night awakenings were assessed with the Children Sleep Habits Questionnaire, and Emotional/behavioral problems were assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) at 4 and 5 years old. Independent sample T-tests were used to assess differences between children with and without SW/ST. At 4 years old, 2.7% of children presented SW and 27.4% ST. At 5 years old, 4.4% of children were sleepwalking and 20.5% sleeptalking. Five-year-old children with SW or ST (or both), had more depressive problems (2.68 ± 2.41 vs 1.67 ± 1.81, p=.001), anxiety problems (9.984 ± 3.36 vs 2.16±=2.18, p<.001), pervasive developmental problems (3.84 ± 2.67 vs 2.68 ± 2.41, p=.001), and oppositional/defiant problems (3.33 ± 2.49 vs 2.60 ± 2.53, p=.04) than children without SW/ST. Similar results were observed at 4 years old. Although children with SW or ST (or both) had more night awakenings (4.45 ± 1.53 vs 3.92 ± 1.36, p=.01) than children without SW/ST, no differences were found in sleep duration and duration of awakenings (p>.05). Children who experienced SW and∕or ST also had more depressive, anxious, pervasive developmental and oppositional/defiant problems than children without SW/ST. While they also showed more nocturnal awakenings, other sleep characteristics were not affected. A better understanding of the mechanisms linking parasomnias and psychological problems could eventually represent a new therapeutic avenue to the treatment of both psychological and sleep problems. Canadian Institute of Health Research, Ludmer Centre for Neuroinformatics and Mental Health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.399
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicHomelessness and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207