Importance de la diffusion atomique et de ses conséquences hydrodynamiques sur la structure interne et les paramètres observationnels des étoiles
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Atomic diffusion must be taken into account in the computations of stellar structure and evolution as it is a direct consequence of the fact that stars are self-gravitating spheres composed of a mixture of different gases (the chemical elements). The stellar equilibrium leads to internal gradients of pressure, density and temperature as well as an upward radiative transfer which produces a selective effect on the elements (in most cases dominated by the competition between gravitational settling and radiative acceleration).The interactions between atomic diffusion and well-known hydrodynamical processes like dynamical convection and mass loss have been studied for a long time. An important process was however forgotten in these computations. This is the double-diffusive (or fingering or thermohaline) convection induced by unstable μ-gradients, which can be produced by the local accumulation of heavy elements inside stars due to radiative acceleration. Contrary to the other hydrodynamical processes, fingering convection is not arbitrarily added in the computations. It is directly induced by atomic diffusion itself and cannot be avoided. It is thus very important to add this hydrodynamical process in stellar evolution modelling, which has never been done before our work. A similar effect occurs below the convective zone in case of accretion of heavy matter onto a star.We studied the accretion-induced fingering convection in the case of the stellar system 16 Cygni. We studied the properties of these two stars by computing models with the Toulouse Geneva Evolution Code (TGEC). We included the Brown et al. 2013 prescription for the computations of fingering convection in the code. We computed oscillation frequencies of these models using the PULSE code to compare it with Kepler observations. We found that if 2/3 of Earth mass is accreted at the beginning of the main sequence (on 16 Cyg B model), the accretion-induced fingering convection mixes the star deep enough to destroy the lithium and obtain the observed difference between 16 Cyg A and B.We studied the heavy element accumulation and the induced fingering convection in the case of Am stars. In these stars, peculiar surface abundances are observed (compared to the sun). This peculiarity is related to the effect of atomic diffusion, very important in these types of stars. However, atomic diffusion alone leads to abundance variations which are too large and one way to reproduce the observed abundance quantitatively is to assume mixing deep enough inside the star. We computed models including atomic diffusion (with radiative acceleration) and fingering convection with this prescription using the TGEC code. We find than this process may change the internal structure of the stars, and also the surface abundances. We also included fingering convection and the accretion process in the Montreal/Montpellier code. We modified some parts of this code (e.g. turbulence profiles) to compare the results obtained with the two codes. We computed some models and I found that the results are quite similar.We determined the stellar parameters of the star 94 Ceti (by using similar seismic computations as for 16 Cyg A and B) using ground-based observations. This star has a mass of 1.44 MΘ and is a good target to study the effect of radiative accelerations (which occur for masses larger than 1.2-1.3 MΘ). We also compared models with full atmosphere with the observations to determine the impact on oscillation frequencies.We worked on metal poor halo stars for which a dispersion of lithium surface abundance is observed for very small metallicities. We studied the possibility of an accretion of matter that can trigger fingering convection and destroy lithium.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».