MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2810258206 · doi:10.1353/apr.2004.0031

Introduction: Globalization and Anti-Globalization of SARS in Chinese Societies

2004· article· en· W2810258206 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alvin Y. So, Ngai Pun

Notice bibliographique

RevueAsian perspective · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Security and Public Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGlobalizationOutbreakChinaPolitical scienceAgency (philosophy)Economic growthDevelopment economicsGeographyEconomyMedicineVirologySociologyEconomicsSocial scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

ASIAN PERSPECTIVE, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2004, pp. 5-17. INTRODUCTION: GLOBALIZATION AND ANTI-GLOBALIZATION OF SARS IN CHINESE SOCIETIES Alvin Y. So and Ngai Pun It is well known that SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syn­ drome) is a product of globalization. Otherwise, it could not possibly spread so fast to so many countries in such a short time. From Metropole Hotel in Waterloo Road on February 21, 2003, SARS spread to the entire Hong Kong Special Administra­ tive Region, Singapore, Vietnam, and Canada, and then further spread in a few weeks through international air travel routes to other countries in Asia, North America, and Europe. However, if globalization has facilitated the spread of SARS, it also has laid the foundation for controlling it. The global agency of WHO (the World Health Organization) quickly launched a Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN), linking together 112 existing networks that together possess much of the data, expertise, and skills needed to keep the international com­ munity alert to SARS outbreaks and ready to respond.1 Perhaps owing to WHO's global network and prompt action, SARS cases were quickly detected and isolated in the world, with the result that further transmission was either avoided entirely or kept to a very small number of cases. By1 1. WHO (World Health Organization), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS): Status of the Outbreak and Lessonsfor the Immediate Future (Geneva: World Health Organization, Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response, May 20, 2003). 6 Alvin Y. So and Ngai Pun early June 2003, SARS seemed to be under control in most coun­ tries.2 This rapid containment of SARS is in strict contrast to the deadly Spanish Flu in 1918 that is believed to have killed more than 50 million people. Instead of studying how globalization affects SARS, however, this special issue examines the intricate relationship between the global and the local, and between pro-globalization discourses and resistance to them from below. Not without ambition, this special issue highlights the other side of the equation, i.e., how SARS has affected the globalization process as well as national policies and social movements. Business reports, of course, have argued that SARS will have little long-term impact on globaliza­ tion because transnational corporations have not yet pulled their investments out of Asia.3 Besides, they believed that SARS's adverse economic effects would recede quickly once SARS ended, because the broad fundaments for Asian investments are still fine.4 Going beyond this pro-globalization view, this issue will focus on whether SARS is globalization. Could SARS become a resistance movement to globalization? Can SARS hold back or even challenge the hegemony of globalization? This special issue probably cannot provide clear-cut answers to the above questions. As Ho-fung Hung said, SARS comes and goes. But what we can learn from SARS about global­ ization is profound and has long-lasting implications for our understanding of globalization, a buzzword that has triggered intense debates. Benefiting from a multidisciplinary perspective, and based on research on SARS in Chinese societies, we hope to shed light on the meaning of globalization and anti-globalization -especially with reference to the discussion of the potential and the prospect for SARS to become an anti-globalization movement-and on the way SARS helped to generate civil soli­ darity in two Chinese societies. 2. Ibid., p. 4. 3. See Forbes, April 10, 2003. 4. New York Times, April 28, 2003. Introduction: Globalization andAnti-Globalization ofSARSin Chinese Societies 7 Globalization: What's in a Name? As Jessop points out, "globalization is a polyvalent, promis­ cuous, controversial word that often obscures more than it reveals about recent economic, political, social, and cultural changes."5 Globalization is such an overloaded concept because it includes so many different processes under its cover. For the sake of analyzing the SARS problem, we highlight several aspects of the globalization process. The first is transborder linkages. At the spatial level, global­ ization describes the intensification of transborder links among different cities, countries, and regions in the world. Due to advances in technology, communication, and transportation, there is a vast flow of people, products, money, information, values, and even diseases across borders every...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,572
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,990

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,010
Tête enseignante GPT0,316
Écart entre enseignants0,306 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAsian perspectiveMême sujetGlobal Security and Public HealthTravaux en français237 207