Introduction: Globalization and Anti-Globalization of SARS in Chinese Societies

ASIAN PERSPECTIVE, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2004, pp. 5-17. INTRODUCTION: GLOBALIZATION AND ANTI-GLOBALIZATION OF SARS IN CHINESE SOCIETIES Alvin Y. So and Ngai Pun It is well known that SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syn­ drome) is a product of globalization. Otherwise, it could not possibly spread so fast to so many countries in such a short time. From Metropole Hotel in Waterloo Road on February 21, 2003, SARS spread to the entire Hong Kong Special Administra­ tive Region, Singapore, Vietnam, and Canada, and then further spread in a few weeks through international air travel routes to other countries in Asia, North America, and Europe. However, if globalization has facilitated the spread of SARS, it also has laid the foundation for controlling it. The global agency of WHO (the World Health Organization) quickly launched a Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network (GOARN), linking together 112 existing networks that together possess much of the data, expertise, and skills needed to keep the international com­ munity alert to SARS outbreaks and ready to respond.1 Perhaps owing to WHO's global network and prompt action, SARS cases were quickly detected and isolated in the world, with the result that further transmission was either avoided entirely or kept to a very small number of cases. By1 1. WHO (World Health Organization), Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS): Status of the Outbreak and Lessonsfor the Immediate Future (Geneva: World Health Organization, Communicable Disease Surveillance and Response, May 20, 2003). 6 Alvin Y. So and Ngai Pun early June 2003, SARS seemed to be under control in most coun­ tries.2 This rapid containment of SARS is in strict contrast to the deadly Spanish Flu in 1918 that is believed to have killed more than 50 million people. Instead of studying how globalization affects SARS, however, this special issue examines the intricate relationship between the global and the local, and between pro-globalization discourses and resistance to them from below. Not without ambition, this special issue highlights the other side of the equation, i.e., how SARS has affected the globalization process as well as national policies and social movements. Business reports, of course, have argued that SARS will have little long-term impact on globaliza­ tion because transnational corporations have not yet pulled their investments out of Asia.3 Besides, they believed that SARS's adverse economic effects would recede quickly once SARS ended, because the broad fundaments for Asian investments are still fine.4 Going beyond this pro-globalization view, this issue will focus on whether SARS is globalization. Could SARS become a resistance movement to globalization? Can SARS hold back or even challenge the hegemony of globalization? This special issue probably cannot provide clear-cut answers to the above questions. As Ho-fung Hung said, SARS comes and goes. But what we can learn from SARS about global­ ization is profound and has long-lasting implications for our understanding of globalization, a buzzword that has triggered intense debates. Benefiting from a multidisciplinary perspective, and based on research on SARS in Chinese societies, we hope to shed light on the meaning of globalization and anti-globalization -especially with reference to the discussion of the potential and the prospect for SARS to become an anti-globalization movement-and on the way SARS helped to generate civil soli­ darity in two Chinese societies. 2. Ibid., p. 4. 3. See Forbes, April 10, 2003. 4. New York Times, April 28, 2003. Introduction: Globalization andAnti-Globalization ofSARSin Chinese Societies 7 Globalization: What's in a Name? As Jessop points out, "globalization is a polyvalent, promis­ cuous, controversial word that often obscures more than it reveals about recent economic, political, social, and cultural changes."5 Globalization is such an overloaded concept because it includes so many different processes under its cover. For the sake of analyzing the SARS problem, we highlight several aspects of the globalization process. The first is transborder linkages. At the spatial level, global­ ization describes the intensification of transborder links among different cities, countries, and regions in the world. Due to advances in technology, communication, and transportation, there is a vast flow of people, products, money, information, values, and even diseases across borders every...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.