Canada's Disarmers: The Complicated Struggle Against Nuclear Weapons, 1959-1963
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This dissertation investigates the motivations, messages, and methods of Canadians who organized in opposition to nuclear weapons between 1959 and 1963.The efforts of Canadian anti-nuclear movements have been undervalued in histories of disarmament activism.Canadian disarmers have been dismissed as quiet in comparison to better-known movements in the United States and in Great Britain.This dissertation demonstrates that there were in fact complex and vigorous expressions of anti-nuclear sentiment in Cold War Canada.Canadian disarmers may have been few in number, and may have been conservative in their protest methods, but they were committed participants in an international struggle to protect humanity from the threat of nuclear war.There were many Canadian movements in opposition to the Bomb, both organized and disorganized, which were shaped by the diverse relationships that disarmers had to the world around them.Disarmers' endeavours were informed by engagements with feminisms, Western ideals of masculinity, parents' desires to protect their children, young people's hopes to inherit a world of peace and prosperity, longstanding ideas about social protest, concerns over domestic politics, and enthusiasm for international cooperation.Focusing on the various ways in which Canadians worked for disarmament in the early 1960s, this study demonstrates how much often divided and sometimes isolated disarmament organizations shared.This dissertation is the first extended historical analysis of anti-nuclear efforts in Canada in the late 1950s and early 1960s.It is also a necessary revision of the existing historiography on disarmament activism.This dissertation brings together diverse iii literatures on Canada's Sixties; American, British, and Western European disarmament and peace movements; connected social movements such as the New Left, feminist movements, and environmental movements; and histories of children and childhood.The thesis offers a reassessment of these movements and their importance to an understanding of Cold War social and political dynamics.In 1961, British pacifist leader Bertrand Russell praised Canadian anti-nuclear efforts, declaring "The movement for nuclear disarmament in Canada has already shown itself vigorous and forthright, and has roused the admiration of those of us in Britain who are engaged in the same task."5 Yet these "vigorous" efforts have received little scholarly attention.Furthermore, when they have been considered, historians have often dismissed disarmament efforts as part of a larger tradition of "quiet" 6 peace protest by "unpoliticized" Canadians.7 Lawrence S. Wittner, the preeminent scholar of global disarmament activism, classified Canadian efforts as "minimal" and "small" in his classic three-volume history of Cold War international anti-nuclear protest movements.8 From the earliest days of disarmament activity in Canada, disarmers have been all but ignored because of comparisons to larger American and British movements and public misconceptions that there was "no protest in Canada."9 Though Canadian anti-nuclear disarmers were fewer in number than their compatriots in the United States and Great Britain, Canadians who worked to prevent a nuclear war and who challenged the logic behind nuclear deterrence were far from quiet. 5
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,027 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».