Canada's Disarmers: The Complicated Struggle Against Nuclear Weapons, 1959-1963
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This dissertation investigates the motivations, messages, and methods of Canadians who organized in opposition to nuclear weapons between 1959 and 1963.The efforts of Canadian anti-nuclear movements have been undervalued in histories of disarmament activism.Canadian disarmers have been dismissed as quiet in comparison to better-known movements in the United States and in Great Britain.This dissertation demonstrates that there were in fact complex and vigorous expressions of anti-nuclear sentiment in Cold War Canada.Canadian disarmers may have been few in number, and may have been conservative in their protest methods, but they were committed participants in an international struggle to protect humanity from the threat of nuclear war.There were many Canadian movements in opposition to the Bomb, both organized and disorganized, which were shaped by the diverse relationships that disarmers had to the world around them.Disarmers' endeavours were informed by engagements with feminisms, Western ideals of masculinity, parents' desires to protect their children, young people's hopes to inherit a world of peace and prosperity, longstanding ideas about social protest, concerns over domestic politics, and enthusiasm for international cooperation.Focusing on the various ways in which Canadians worked for disarmament in the early 1960s, this study demonstrates how much often divided and sometimes isolated disarmament organizations shared.This dissertation is the first extended historical analysis of anti-nuclear efforts in Canada in the late 1950s and early 1960s.It is also a necessary revision of the existing historiography on disarmament activism.This dissertation brings together diverse iii literatures on Canada's Sixties; American, British, and Western European disarmament and peace movements; connected social movements such as the New Left, feminist movements, and environmental movements; and histories of children and childhood.The thesis offers a reassessment of these movements and their importance to an understanding of Cold War social and political dynamics.In 1961, British pacifist leader Bertrand Russell praised Canadian anti-nuclear efforts, declaring "The movement for nuclear disarmament in Canada has already shown itself vigorous and forthright, and has roused the admiration of those of us in Britain who are engaged in the same task."5 Yet these "vigorous" efforts have received little scholarly attention.Furthermore, when they have been considered, historians have often dismissed disarmament efforts as part of a larger tradition of "quiet" 6 peace protest by "unpoliticized" Canadians.7 Lawrence S. Wittner, the preeminent scholar of global disarmament activism, classified Canadian efforts as "minimal" and "small" in his classic three-volume history of Cold War international anti-nuclear protest movements.8 From the earliest days of disarmament activity in Canada, disarmers have been all but ignored because of comparisons to larger American and British movements and public misconceptions that there was "no protest in Canada."9 Though Canadian anti-nuclear disarmers were fewer in number than their compatriots in the United States and Great Britain, Canadians who worked to prevent a nuclear war and who challenged the logic behind nuclear deterrence were far from quiet. 5
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.027 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".