Practical implications of serious gaming for urban redevelopment of Merwe4Haven in Rotterdam
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Is there added value in the utilisation of serious gaming outcome for practice in real life? One of the courses at Management in the Built Environment at the faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment of Delft University of Technology is the management game. Didactics of this course have been previously discussed at ERES. The focus of this paper is on the content and results of the latest edition. In 2017/2018 the course is given in the first and third quarter with urban redevelopment of the harbour area Merwe4Haven in Rotterdam and Schiedam as topic. Respectively 80 and 175 students have worked together in groups within the concept of roleplay. With groups of 9 students, this resulted in 30 strategies for the area. The purpose of this paper is twofold: firstly a comprehensive summary of those 30 strategies, and secondly an evaluation of the management game as a mean to reach such results, and the utility of these result for policy and practice. The research approach is at one hand a typical example of research by design – evaluation of the 30 parallel designed strategies and how it is accepted by stakeholders. From the educational point of view the research questions relate more to the level of complexity and scale which can be achieved within a course based on roleplay within the given limitations; the available time students can spend in 10 weeks and the entrance level of students halfway their study. The specific findings in this paper is a list of development strategies relevant for practice. Municipalities are using the results especially to enhance brainstorming during policy making and support the dialogue with their citizens. The more extreme solutions may not always be realistic, but can be instrumental in brainstorming and fostering discussion. The educational reflection reveals a trade-off between complexity and depth. Introducing a large scale with many stakeholders and optional impacts on the area and influences in many fields lead to a more abstract perception of the strategy where design concepts stay less tangible. The implication of this paper is to strengthen social and practical utilisation of education. With public presentation of the results society have immediate profit of the outcome and practitioners can apply the outcomes in the process of redevelopment, while students have a realistic experience (reflection of society and practice) to enrich their education.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».