Gendered States of Punishment and Welfare: Feminist Political Economy, Primitive Accumulation and the LawA.Roberts. Abingdon: Routledge (2017) 204pp. £92.00hb ISBN 978‐1‐138‐67842‐1
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Gendered States of Punishment and Welfare highlights exploitative gendered relations, within both the private and public spheres, on which capitalist production depends, historically and within the ongoing neoliberal project. Using a case-study approach, the book highlights the historic development of the neoliberal project in three cognate countries – the UK, the US, and Canada – highlighting important similarities in each state's pursuit of economic liberalisation and perpetual growth, and the use of punitive and disciplinary mechanisms to manage and incapacitate those surplus to the market's needs. While mass incarceration on a US scale might be exceptional, the ‘draconian forms of policing and punishment’ that underpin this phenomenon are, nonetheless, widespread, particularly in the UK and, more surprisingly, in Canada, a country more often held up as the antithesis to the US (p.2). The book sits in the field of political economy, but it contributes much more broadly across the social sciences. It is particularly relevant to postgraduate students and researchers within criminology, sociology, women's studies and those interested in the development of the New Punitiveness and the retrenchment of social welfare provision. It revisits important subject areas raised in seminal works such as Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Foucault 1977), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (Garland 2001) and Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity (Wacquant 2009). It employs a feminist lens to highlight the gendered character of social control and disciplinary power and foregrounds gendered social relations as the key constituent of the neoliberal project. This book is written from a feminist Marxist perspective, and is highly critical of the political systems it considers. The author is keen to foreground gender in her critique of the neoliberal project. Gender is the elephant in the room: the subordination of women has been a key building block of primitive accumulation, capitalism and neoliberalism, yet has received scant attention, or has been treated as something outside the purview of historical materialist accounts. The book thus highlights the continued omission of gender relations in mainstream theorisations of the ongoing punitive management and incapacitation of the working classes. A key contribution is the nuancing of Garland's theoretical framework of penal welfarism which is adapted to reflect the highly-gendered nature of these processes. A more accurate conceptual tool is thus presented: ‘penal-welfare paternalism’ (p.98, italics added). The gender politics underpinning the dramatic rise in the number of women imprisoned over the last 30 years has, to date, been overlooked. The author sets out to address this and highlights the racial and class dimensions within this development. Importantly, the book contends that what we see currently in global production chains is not new, but more a blast from the past; capitalist production has always relied on exploitative relations along class, gender, and racial lines. The book highlights how the law is used not only as a repressive tool by the dominant classes, but also how it is constitutive of capitalism itself. In fact, the law and capitalism are regarded as mutually constitutive, both producing and reproducing social relations between private property and wage labour, and between genders. The author presents insights into the hierarchies of social injustice with reference to black women in the US and indigenous women in Canada. This could be further developed in line with intersectional feminist approaches to encompass micro-level perspectives of other hyper-marginalised groups such as immigrant/stateless women, those who do not conform to heteronormative binary gender roles, and especially those multiply excluded at intersections of discrimination, such as trans women of colour. Overall, Gendered States of Punishment and Welfare offers a powerful contribution to analyses of the penal-welfare nexus and the pervasiveness of gendered oppression within capitalism, both historically and within contemporary practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».