MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2891873866 · doi:10.1111/hojo.12280

Gendered States of Punishment and Welfare: Feminist Political Economy, Primitive Accumulation and the LawA.Roberts. Abingdon: Routledge (2017) 204pp. £92.00hb ISBN 978‐1‐138‐67842‐1

2018· article· en· W2891873866 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Larissa Povey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Howard Journal of Crime and Justice · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)DisciplinePoliticsSociologyPolitical scienceCriminologyPolitical economySocial scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Gendered States of Punishment and Welfare highlights exploitative gendered relations, within both the private and public spheres, on which capitalist production depends, historically and within the ongoing neoliberal project. Using a case-study approach, the book highlights the historic development of the neoliberal project in three cognate countries – the UK, the US, and Canada – highlighting important similarities in each state's pursuit of economic liberalisation and perpetual growth, and the use of punitive and disciplinary mechanisms to manage and incapacitate those surplus to the market's needs. While mass incarceration on a US scale might be exceptional, the ‘draconian forms of policing and punishment’ that underpin this phenomenon are, nonetheless, widespread, particularly in the UK and, more surprisingly, in Canada, a country more often held up as the antithesis to the US (p.2). The book sits in the field of political economy, but it contributes much more broadly across the social sciences. It is particularly relevant to postgraduate students and researchers within criminology, sociology, women's studies and those interested in the development of the New Punitiveness and the retrenchment of social welfare provision. It revisits important subject areas raised in seminal works such as Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Foucault 1977), The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society (Garland 2001) and Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity (Wacquant 2009). It employs a feminist lens to highlight the gendered character of social control and disciplinary power and foregrounds gendered social relations as the key constituent of the neoliberal project. This book is written from a feminist Marxist perspective, and is highly critical of the political systems it considers. The author is keen to foreground gender in her critique of the neoliberal project. Gender is the elephant in the room: the subordination of women has been a key building block of primitive accumulation, capitalism and neoliberalism, yet has received scant attention, or has been treated as something outside the purview of historical materialist accounts. The book thus highlights the continued omission of gender relations in mainstream theorisations of the ongoing punitive management and incapacitation of the working classes. A key contribution is the nuancing of Garland's theoretical framework of penal welfarism which is adapted to reflect the highly-gendered nature of these processes. A more accurate conceptual tool is thus presented: ‘penal-welfare paternalism’ (p.98, italics added). The gender politics underpinning the dramatic rise in the number of women imprisoned over the last 30 years has, to date, been overlooked. The author sets out to address this and highlights the racial and class dimensions within this development. Importantly, the book contends that what we see currently in global production chains is not new, but more a blast from the past; capitalist production has always relied on exploitative relations along class, gender, and racial lines. The book highlights how the law is used not only as a repressive tool by the dominant classes, but also how it is constitutive of capitalism itself. In fact, the law and capitalism are regarded as mutually constitutive, both producing and reproducing social relations between private property and wage labour, and between genders. The author presents insights into the hierarchies of social injustice with reference to black women in the US and indigenous women in Canada. This could be further developed in line with intersectional feminist approaches to encompass micro-level perspectives of other hyper-marginalised groups such as immigrant/stateless women, those who do not conform to heteronormative binary gender roles, and especially those multiply excluded at intersections of discrimination, such as trans women of colour. Overall, Gendered States of Punishment and Welfare offers a powerful contribution to analyses of the penal-welfare nexus and the pervasiveness of gendered oppression within capitalism, both historically and within contemporary practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.032
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Howard Journal of Crime and JusticeSame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207