The neurocognitive impairment associated with comorbid schizophrenia and Ptsd
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Individuals with severe mental illness report a higher incidence of trauma and PTSD than the general population. A trauma history in individuals with schizophrenia has been associated with more severe psychiatric symptoms including positive symptoms, depression, suicidality, anxiety, somatization and dissociation (Beck & van der Kolk, 1987; Craine, Henson, Colliver & MacLean, 1988; Ross, Anderson & Clark, 1994; Darves-Bornoz, & Gaillard, 1995; Holowka, King, Saheb, Pukall & Brunett, 2003; Strauss et al., 2006); The current study is among the first to examine the influence of comorbid schizophrenia and PTSD by performing comprehensive diagnostic, symptom and neurocognitive evaluations on four groups: normal controls (n = 26), a PTSD group (n = 21), a schizophrenia group (n = 26), and a group of individuals with schizophrenia and PTSD (n = 21); Participants were administered the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Diagnosis (SCID). Those who met diagnostic criteria were administered a battery of tests designed to assess psychiatric symptoms (Schedule for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, Schedule for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, the Calgary Depression Rating Scale, and the Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist-Civilian) and an extensive battery of neuropsychological tests in order to assess all major neurocognitive domains. It was hypothesized that the combined effects of schizophrenia and PTSD would produce greater neurocognitive impairment than either disorder when it occurred alone; Results of neurocognitive tests indicated that the schizophrenia groups performed significantly worse than the Control and PTSD groups in all neurocognitive domains. No significant differences were present between the PTSD and Control group. While the differences were not significant between the comorbid group (SZP) and the schizophrenia only group (SZ), there were some domains in which the mean performance of the SZP group was different than the means of the SZ group. The SZP group performed approximately one standard deviation poorer than the SZ group on the Attention Domain. Conversely, the SZP group scored approximately one-half of a standard deviation better than the SZ group on the Executive Domain and the Visual Learning/Memory Domain. Results of this study do not support the idea that the presence of comorbid PTSD results in increased cognitive impairment in schizophrenia, more than what might be expected in schizophrenia alone. In fact, the presence of PTSD in individuals with schizophrenia may be associated with slightly better performance in many neurocognitive domains. Results of this study do, however, suggest some areas of neurocognitive function to further investigate, including Attention, Executive Function, and Visual Memory. In conclusion, while the presence of PTSD in individuals with schizophrenia is associated with a different pattern of psychiatric symptoms, PTSD may not significantly impact neurocognitive function in a consistent manner, if at all.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».