MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2897499883 · doi:10.2134/csa2018.63.1001

Potential for Compost to Improve Potato Production Soil

2018· article· en· W2897499883 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tracy Hmielowski

Notice bibliographique

RevueCSA News · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePotato Plant Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCompostEnvironmental scienceAgricultureAgronomySoil healthSoil organic matterCrop rotationTillageOrganic farmingAgricultural scienceAgroforestryCropSoil waterGeographyBiologySoil science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Carolyn Wilson, an M.S. student who worked with Bernie Zebarth on this research. Maintaining soil health in agricultural systems can be a challenge for any crop, but potatoes are particularly hard on the soil. Growing potatoes requires tillage and soil disturbance to plant and harvest, and limited plant residues are left to replenish soil organic matter and nutrients. One way to reduce the negative impact of potato farming is to have a three- to four-year rotation between potato crops. However, in some regions, high demand for the crop and limited land for increased production limit this option. Bernie Zebarth, a Research Scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, explains that in eastern Canada, where potatoes are grown primarily for french fry production for the export market, producers were concerned that stagnating potato yields would make the region less competitive in global markets. Knowing that declining soil health may be an important limitation, the potato industry asked soil scientists to collaborate with them to find solutions. Research from other potato-producing regions demonstrated how compost can improve soil health and increase yield. The addition of compost immediately increases soil organic matter, and the greater soil organic matter increases water-holding capacity. Water-holding capacity is important in rainfed agriculture, like that in eastern Canada, and improved water-holding capacity can subsequently boost potato crop yields. Zebarth and colleagues in eastern Canada designed an experiment to test the effects of compost addition, and the results of this research are reported in the Soil Science Society of America Journal (https://bit.ly/2CqoheZ). The field experiment was established in 2014 at the research center in New Brunswick, Canada. The experiment compared five compost products and a non-amended control. The compost products were locally available and varied in composition including forestry residue, poultry manure, forestry residue and poultry manure combined, a marine compost with shells, and source-separated organic waste. Experimental plots mimicked the potato production practices in eastern Canada, including being rainfed. Compost was spread by hand to get uniform application. The researchers measured soil quality variables after one and two years of annual compost applications. The data set included a suite of soil properties, including pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), plant-available nutrients, soil water-holding capacity (WHC), soil aggregate stability, total C, total N, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), particulate organic matter (POM), and soil respiration among others. The authors determined that the addition of compost products did improve soil quality in the two years of this experiment. A 24% increase in soil organic carbon, and in some cases a doubling of particulate organic matter carbon, compared with the non-amended control, demonstrated that compost can improve both the quantity and quality of soil organic matter. The researchers also observed an increase in soil pH and the concentration of Mehlich-3 extractable K, Ca, Mg, and S in both years of the experiment. While these results were promising, the improvement in soil health did not immediately increase potato yields (yield response results will be reported in a separate article currently in preparation). “It was expected that the increased soil organic matter would increase soil water holding, and by this means, increase yield in this rainfed production systems,” Zebarth says. “Surprisingly, the increased soil organic matter did not increase water-holding capacity, at least in the short term.” It could be that it takes more time for crops to benefit from compost additions or that different types of compost would have a faster response time. View the full article, “Short-Term Effects of Diverse Compost Products on Soil Quality in Potato Production,” in the July–August 2018 issue of the Soil Science Society of America Journal: https://bit.ly/2CqoheZ. While unable to make clear recommendations to potato growers in eastern Canada, the research did gain valuable insight into compost sources. For growers who want to add compost to improve soils, the authors suggest they seek out mature compost that has high dry matter and high carbon (low ash).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,456
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,444

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,244 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCSA NewsMême sujetPotato Plant ResearchTravaux en français237 207