MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897499883 · doi:10.2134/csa2018.63.1001

Potential for Compost to Improve Potato Production Soil

2018· article· en· W2897499883 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tracy Hmielowski

Bibliographic record

VenueCSA News · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPotato Plant Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompostEnvironmental scienceAgricultureAgronomySoil healthSoil organic matterCrop rotationTillageOrganic farmingAgricultural scienceAgroforestryCropSoil waterGeographyBiologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carolyn Wilson, an M.S. student who worked with Bernie Zebarth on this research. Maintaining soil health in agricultural systems can be a challenge for any crop, but potatoes are particularly hard on the soil. Growing potatoes requires tillage and soil disturbance to plant and harvest, and limited plant residues are left to replenish soil organic matter and nutrients. One way to reduce the negative impact of potato farming is to have a three- to four-year rotation between potato crops. However, in some regions, high demand for the crop and limited land for increased production limit this option. Bernie Zebarth, a Research Scientist with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, explains that in eastern Canada, where potatoes are grown primarily for french fry production for the export market, producers were concerned that stagnating potato yields would make the region less competitive in global markets. Knowing that declining soil health may be an important limitation, the potato industry asked soil scientists to collaborate with them to find solutions. Research from other potato-producing regions demonstrated how compost can improve soil health and increase yield. The addition of compost immediately increases soil organic matter, and the greater soil organic matter increases water-holding capacity. Water-holding capacity is important in rainfed agriculture, like that in eastern Canada, and improved water-holding capacity can subsequently boost potato crop yields. Zebarth and colleagues in eastern Canada designed an experiment to test the effects of compost addition, and the results of this research are reported in the Soil Science Society of America Journal (https://bit.ly/2CqoheZ). The field experiment was established in 2014 at the research center in New Brunswick, Canada. The experiment compared five compost products and a non-amended control. The compost products were locally available and varied in composition including forestry residue, poultry manure, forestry residue and poultry manure combined, a marine compost with shells, and source-separated organic waste. Experimental plots mimicked the potato production practices in eastern Canada, including being rainfed. Compost was spread by hand to get uniform application. The researchers measured soil quality variables after one and two years of annual compost applications. The data set included a suite of soil properties, including pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), plant-available nutrients, soil water-holding capacity (WHC), soil aggregate stability, total C, total N, microbial biomass carbon (MBC), particulate organic matter (POM), and soil respiration among others. The authors determined that the addition of compost products did improve soil quality in the two years of this experiment. A 24% increase in soil organic carbon, and in some cases a doubling of particulate organic matter carbon, compared with the non-amended control, demonstrated that compost can improve both the quantity and quality of soil organic matter. The researchers also observed an increase in soil pH and the concentration of Mehlich-3 extractable K, Ca, Mg, and S in both years of the experiment. While these results were promising, the improvement in soil health did not immediately increase potato yields (yield response results will be reported in a separate article currently in preparation). “It was expected that the increased soil organic matter would increase soil water holding, and by this means, increase yield in this rainfed production systems,” Zebarth says. “Surprisingly, the increased soil organic matter did not increase water-holding capacity, at least in the short term.” It could be that it takes more time for crops to benefit from compost additions or that different types of compost would have a faster response time. View the full article, “Short-Term Effects of Diverse Compost Products on Soil Quality in Potato Production,” in the July–August 2018 issue of the Soil Science Society of America Journal: https://bit.ly/2CqoheZ. While unable to make clear recommendations to potato growers in eastern Canada, the research did gain valuable insight into compost sources. For growers who want to add compost to improve soils, the authors suggest they seek out mature compost that has high dry matter and high carbon (low ash).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCSA NewsSame topicPotato Plant ResearchFrench-language works237,207