MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2897944648 · doi:10.1111/bjh.15572

Primary cutaneous acral <scp>CD</scp>8<sup>+</sup> T‐cell lymphomas relapse more frequently in younger patients

2018· review· en· W2897944648 sur OpenAlexaff
E. Maubec, Eduardo Marinho, L. Laroche, Andrew Mitchell, Florent Grange, Tony Petrella

Notice bibliographique

RevueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2018
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineImmunologyCancer researchDermatology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma (PCA-CD8+ TCL), originally named indolent primary cutaneous CD8+ T-cell lymphoproliferation, is a rare entity that was classified as “provisional” in the recently revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue tumours (Swerdlow et al, 2016). PCA-CD8+ TCL usually has a favourable prognosis. Except for one reported case with extracutaneous involvement (Alberti-Violetti et al, 2017), only cutaneous relapses have been described. However, these relapses have not yet been clinically characterized. Herein, we update a case of PCA-CD8+ TCL, with a very late relapse, that had originally been reported by Petrella et al (2007). We analysed the literature and compared clinical characteristics of patients with relapsing and non-relapsing disease. In July 2006, a 29-year-old woman with no remarkable medical history was referred for a painless nodule on the left ear helix of 4 months duration (Fig 1A). Histological examination of the surgically excised lesion found a dense and diffuse proliferation of monomorphous, medium-sized T cells throughout the dermis and subcutis. The tumour-cell immunophenotype was CD3+CD8+CD4−TIA1+granzyme B−CD2+CD5+CD7−CD30−CD56−CD99+ and Ki67 < 10%. T-cell receptor gene analysis showed monoclonal rearrangement. Staging, including computed-tomography (CT) scan, bone marrow biopsy and complete blood count, was normal. No circulating T-cell clone was found. Borrelia burgdorferi serology was negative. Radiotherapy was delivered, obtaining a complete response. Seven years later she was referred again for 2 slowly enlarging, poorly defined papules on the right ear helix (Fig 1B). No enlarged lymph nodes were found during physical examination. Positron-emission tomography–CT scan and peripheral blood tests, including complete blood count and T-cell clonality, were normal or negative. Papule histological features were very similar to those of the initial lesion, except for the deeper location of the cellular proliferation, resulting in a thicker Grenz zone. Radiotherapy was again delivered, followed several weeks later by complete remission. After three more years of follow-up, no recurrence has occurred. Since the initial description of this entity by Petrella et al (2007), 54 PCA-CD8+ TCL cases have been published, predominantly involving the ear (n = 31). Recurrences/progression occurred in 11 (20%) of these cases, including our patient and 5 others involving the ear. Characteristics at initial diagnosis and relapse/progression of these 8 men and 3 women, median age 47 (range: 29–69) years at diagnosis, are detailed in Table 1. Progression (24 months): R shoulder, nodule, NR; rT2, W+W, PDProgression (NR): R arm, shoulders, nodules, 20 mm; rT3b, W+W, SD Progression (12 months): R and L ears, nodule, NR; rT3a, surgical excision, PR Progression (24 months): R ear, nodule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision, CR Relapse (30 months): R ear, nodule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision, CR Relapse (34 months): L foot and toes, plaques; rT1a, RT, CR Relapse (45 months): L foot, 1 plaque, NR; rT2a, RT, CR Relapse (48 months): L foot (papules) and R ear (3 papulonodules), 8 mm; rT3a, RT and MTX, CR Relapse (12 months): R ear, papule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision or RT, CR Relapse (36 months): L ear, papule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision or RT, CR Relapse (60 months): nose, papule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision or RT, CR Relapse (<12 months): hands, feet, thigh and nose, papules; rT3b, RT, PR Progression (36 months): multiple sites, NR, NR; IFN, PD This case (Petrella et al, 2007) Initially, all relapsing patients’ lesions were papules or nodules, except one with multiple lesions who also had plaques. At onset, three of the 11 patients had at least 2 non-contiguous body regions involved and were classified as T3; 6 had ear involvement; none had systemic involvement. The median time to diagnosis was 11 months (range: 4 months to 35 years). Reported initial treatments were: 2 watch-and-wait, 2 surgical excisions, 3 radiotherapy, 3 underwent surgical excision and radiotherapy. Ten patients relapsed and another had only slow progression with median follow-up at 117 (range: 0–168) months. Recurrences/progression occurred on acral, non-acral sites or both in 7, 2 and 2 patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 12 months (range: 9–92 months). Staging showed local extracutaneous involvement of the bony nasal septum in one patient. According to the Tumour, Node and Metastasis (TNM) system (Appendix S1), relapse/progression maximum T staging was: rT1 (solitary skin involvement)/rT2 (multiple lesions limited to 1 body region or 2 contiguous body regions) for 6 (55%) patients and rT3 (generalized skin lesions with 2 non-contiguous body regions or ≥3 body regions involved) for 5 (45%). Five of the 6 rT1/T2 patients only relapsed once and none progressed. They underwent local surgery or radiotherapy or received no treatment; 4 of them achieved complete responses. In contrast, all 5 rT3 patients suffered several relapses/progression; 3 of them received systemic treatments; 2 are disease-free. All 11 patients were alive at last update. Relapsing/progressing patients were younger than non-relapsers (47 vs. 56 years, respectively; P = 0·048) but were comparable for sex and tumour location (ear vs. other acral sites) (P > 0·4) (Mann–Whitney test). Follow-up was shorter for patients without relapse/progression than those who relapsed/progressed (mean: 14 vs. 42 months; P = 0·03). Our analysis of published PCA-CD8+ TCL cases revealed a 20% relapse/progression rate with no distant extracutaneous dissemination, and no disease-related death, although this frequency might be underestimated because the follow-up of non-relapsing patients was shorter than that of those who relapsed. PCA-CD8+ TCL relapses/progression should be systematically recorded in available databases to better determine their frequency and characteristics. In routine practice, even though PCA-CD8+ TCL is indolent in most cases, regular monitoring should be implemented to detect potentially late recurrence. Our results indicating that relapsing patients may be younger require further confirmation with a larger cohort. Whether recurrence and primary lesions share the same genotype remains to be determined with molecular studies. Finally, based on our analysis, 2 patient groups may be defined according to their maximum T stages at relapse/progression: one group, with either solitary or 1 or 2 contiguous body region recurrence(s), follows an indolent course requiring local treatment; the other group, with at least 1 relapse involving 2 non-contiguous or ≥3 body regions, experienced repeated relapses that led to chronic disease requiring systemic therapy for 27% of them. These findings confirm the indolent course of PCA-CD8+ TCLs associated with favourable prognoses without death. However, these TCLs might be heterogeneous regarding potentially late and multiple relapses, sometimes requiring systemic therapy. EM designed the study. EM, EMar, LL, AM, FG and TP wrote the paper. AM, LL and TP analysed the data. EM, EMar, FG and TP performed the research. The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,269
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0070,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,285 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations12
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBritish Journal of HaematologyMême sujetCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchTravaux en français237 207