MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2897944648 · doi:10.1111/bjh.15572

Primary cutaneous acral <scp>CD</scp>8<sup>+</sup> T‐cell lymphomas relapse more frequently in younger patients

2018· review· en· W2897944648 on OpenAlexaff
E. Maubec, Eduardo Marinho, L. Laroche, Andrew Mitchell, Florent Grange, Tony Petrella

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Haematology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImmunologyCancer researchDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary cutaneous acral CD8+ T-cell lymphoma (PCA-CD8+ TCL), originally named indolent primary cutaneous CD8+ T-cell lymphoproliferation, is a rare entity that was classified as “provisional” in the recently revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissue tumours (Swerdlow et al, 2016). PCA-CD8+ TCL usually has a favourable prognosis. Except for one reported case with extracutaneous involvement (Alberti-Violetti et al, 2017), only cutaneous relapses have been described. However, these relapses have not yet been clinically characterized. Herein, we update a case of PCA-CD8+ TCL, with a very late relapse, that had originally been reported by Petrella et al (2007). We analysed the literature and compared clinical characteristics of patients with relapsing and non-relapsing disease. In July 2006, a 29-year-old woman with no remarkable medical history was referred for a painless nodule on the left ear helix of 4 months duration (Fig 1A). Histological examination of the surgically excised lesion found a dense and diffuse proliferation of monomorphous, medium-sized T cells throughout the dermis and subcutis. The tumour-cell immunophenotype was CD3+CD8+CD4−TIA1+granzyme B−CD2+CD5+CD7−CD30−CD56−CD99+ and Ki67 < 10%. T-cell receptor gene analysis showed monoclonal rearrangement. Staging, including computed-tomography (CT) scan, bone marrow biopsy and complete blood count, was normal. No circulating T-cell clone was found. Borrelia burgdorferi serology was negative. Radiotherapy was delivered, obtaining a complete response. Seven years later she was referred again for 2 slowly enlarging, poorly defined papules on the right ear helix (Fig 1B). No enlarged lymph nodes were found during physical examination. Positron-emission tomography–CT scan and peripheral blood tests, including complete blood count and T-cell clonality, were normal or negative. Papule histological features were very similar to those of the initial lesion, except for the deeper location of the cellular proliferation, resulting in a thicker Grenz zone. Radiotherapy was again delivered, followed several weeks later by complete remission. After three more years of follow-up, no recurrence has occurred. Since the initial description of this entity by Petrella et al (2007), 54 PCA-CD8+ TCL cases have been published, predominantly involving the ear (n = 31). Recurrences/progression occurred in 11 (20%) of these cases, including our patient and 5 others involving the ear. Characteristics at initial diagnosis and relapse/progression of these 8 men and 3 women, median age 47 (range: 29–69) years at diagnosis, are detailed in Table 1. Progression (24 months): R shoulder, nodule, NR; rT2, W+W, PDProgression (NR): R arm, shoulders, nodules, 20 mm; rT3b, W+W, SD Progression (12 months): R and L ears, nodule, NR; rT3a, surgical excision, PR Progression (24 months): R ear, nodule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision, CR Relapse (30 months): R ear, nodule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision, CR Relapse (34 months): L foot and toes, plaques; rT1a, RT, CR Relapse (45 months): L foot, 1 plaque, NR; rT2a, RT, CR Relapse (48 months): L foot (papules) and R ear (3 papulonodules), 8 mm; rT3a, RT and MTX, CR Relapse (12 months): R ear, papule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision or RT, CR Relapse (36 months): L ear, papule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision or RT, CR Relapse (60 months): nose, papule, NR; rT1a, surgical excision or RT, CR Relapse (<12 months): hands, feet, thigh and nose, papules; rT3b, RT, PR Progression (36 months): multiple sites, NR, NR; IFN, PD This case (Petrella et al, 2007) Initially, all relapsing patients’ lesions were papules or nodules, except one with multiple lesions who also had plaques. At onset, three of the 11 patients had at least 2 non-contiguous body regions involved and were classified as T3; 6 had ear involvement; none had systemic involvement. The median time to diagnosis was 11 months (range: 4 months to 35 years). Reported initial treatments were: 2 watch-and-wait, 2 surgical excisions, 3 radiotherapy, 3 underwent surgical excision and radiotherapy. Ten patients relapsed and another had only slow progression with median follow-up at 117 (range: 0–168) months. Recurrences/progression occurred on acral, non-acral sites or both in 7, 2 and 2 patients, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 12 months (range: 9–92 months). Staging showed local extracutaneous involvement of the bony nasal septum in one patient. According to the Tumour, Node and Metastasis (TNM) system (Appendix S1), relapse/progression maximum T staging was: rT1 (solitary skin involvement)/rT2 (multiple lesions limited to 1 body region or 2 contiguous body regions) for 6 (55%) patients and rT3 (generalized skin lesions with 2 non-contiguous body regions or ≥3 body regions involved) for 5 (45%). Five of the 6 rT1/T2 patients only relapsed once and none progressed. They underwent local surgery or radiotherapy or received no treatment; 4 of them achieved complete responses. In contrast, all 5 rT3 patients suffered several relapses/progression; 3 of them received systemic treatments; 2 are disease-free. All 11 patients were alive at last update. Relapsing/progressing patients were younger than non-relapsers (47 vs. 56 years, respectively; P = 0·048) but were comparable for sex and tumour location (ear vs. other acral sites) (P > 0·4) (Mann–Whitney test). Follow-up was shorter for patients without relapse/progression than those who relapsed/progressed (mean: 14 vs. 42 months; P = 0·03). Our analysis of published PCA-CD8+ TCL cases revealed a 20% relapse/progression rate with no distant extracutaneous dissemination, and no disease-related death, although this frequency might be underestimated because the follow-up of non-relapsing patients was shorter than that of those who relapsed. PCA-CD8+ TCL relapses/progression should be systematically recorded in available databases to better determine their frequency and characteristics. In routine practice, even though PCA-CD8+ TCL is indolent in most cases, regular monitoring should be implemented to detect potentially late recurrence. Our results indicating that relapsing patients may be younger require further confirmation with a larger cohort. Whether recurrence and primary lesions share the same genotype remains to be determined with molecular studies. Finally, based on our analysis, 2 patient groups may be defined according to their maximum T stages at relapse/progression: one group, with either solitary or 1 or 2 contiguous body region recurrence(s), follows an indolent course requiring local treatment; the other group, with at least 1 relapse involving 2 non-contiguous or ≥3 body regions, experienced repeated relapses that led to chronic disease requiring systemic therapy for 27% of them. These findings confirm the indolent course of PCA-CD8+ TCLs associated with favourable prognoses without death. However, these TCLs might be heterogeneous regarding potentially late and multiple relapses, sometimes requiring systemic therapy. EM designed the study. EM, EMar, LL, AM, FG and TP wrote the paper. AM, LL and TP analysed the data. EM, EMar, FG and TP performed the research. The authors reported no potential conflicts of interest. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.269
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish Journal of HaematologySame topicCutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchFrench-language works237,207