MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2900081406 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-110623

A Phase 3 Study of Ravulizumab (ALXN1210) Versus Eculizumab in Adults with Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Naive to Complement Inhibitors: Results of a Subgroup Analysis with Patients Stratified By Baseline Hemolysis Level, Transfusion History, and Demographics

2018· article· en· W2900081406 sur OpenAlexaff
Ilene C. Weitz, Alexander Kulagin, Shinji Nakao, Caroline Piatek, Jeff Szer, Scott T. Rottinghaus, Lori Volles, Andrew I. Damokosh, Rasha Aguzzi, Loree Larratt, Antonio M. Risitano

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueComplement system in diseases
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEculizumabParoxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuriaMedicineClinical endpointInternal medicineSurrogate endpointHemoglobinuriaPediatricsHemolysisImmunologyClinical trialAntibodyComplement system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background/Objective: Ravulizumab (ALXN1210) is an innovative C5 inhibitor with high C5 affinity and a half-life approximately 4 times longer than eculizumab. In the largest interventional clinical study of C5 inhibitor-naive patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) to date, ravulizumab administered every 8 weeks (q8w) was shown to be noninferior to eculizumab (every 2 weeks [q2w]) across 2 coprimary endpoints and 4 key secondary endpoints, due to its ability to provide immediate, complete, and sustained inhibition of complement C5 (Lee et al, EHA-2018). Because PNH is a rare disease, prospective evaluation of new agents for the treatment of this disease, with the exception of ravulizumab, has been limited to small populations. As a result, assessing the effect of treatment in patients with unique disease characteristics and gaining a full understanding of the benefit-to-risk profile of new therapies, has been challenging. The objective of this protocol-specified analysis was to evaluate the relative efficacy of ravulizumab and eculizumab in adult patients with PNH based upon baseline hemolysis level, transfusion history, and demographics. Methods: In this phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority, multicenter study (NCT02946463), patients ≥18 years of age with confirmed diagnosis of PNH, naive to complement inhibitor therapy, with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level ≥1.5 times upper limit of normal (xULN), and ≥1 PNH-related sign/symptom at screening received ravulizumab or eculizumab over a 183 day study period. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were transfusion avoidance and LDH normalization. Secondary endpoints were percent change in LDH, change in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue score, proportion of patients with breakthrough hemolysis, and proportion with stabilized hemoglobin levels. Subgroup analyses were performed on each of these endpoints, based on transfusion history (0, 1-14, or >14 units of packed red blood cells [pRBCs] in the year prior to the first dose of study drug), screening LDH levels (1.5-<3 or ≥3 xULN), sex, age, race, and geographical region. Descriptive statistics are provided with no formal hypothesis testing performed. Results: In total, 246 patients from countries across the Asia-Pacific region (n=124), Europe (n=91), North America (n=9), and South America (n=22) were randomized to ravulizumab (n=125) or eculizumab (n=121). For transfusion avoidance, the point estimates for 15/17 subgroups favored ravulizumab. The treatment effect favored ravulizumab irrespective of prior pRBC transfusion history and baseline LDH levels, as well as nearly all other demographic subgroups assessed (Panel A). With respect to LDH normalization, the point estimates for 11/17 subgroups favored ravulizumab. The treatment effect numerically favored ravulizumab among patients who received 1-14 and >14 pRBCs in the 12 months before randomization, both baseline LDH subgroups, and most of the demographic subgroups (Panel B). No sensitive subgroups were identified for either of the coprimary endpoints. Similarly, point estimates favored ravulizumab in the majority of patient subgroups across each of the key secondary endpoints, including: 8/17 of the subgroups on the assessment of percent change in LDH; 12/17 subgroups on the assessment of change in FACIT-Fatigue score; 13/17 subgroups on the assessment of breakthrough hemolysis; and 13/17 subgroups on the assessment of hemoglobin stabilization. Conclusions: Results of this prespecified analysis revealed point estimates favoring ravulizumab for the majority of the diverse subgroups of PNH patients analyzed. The consistency of these data across subgroups confirms the robustness of the results of this study. The benefit of ravulizumab in terms of transfusion avoidance and LDH normalization was retained across all subgroups. These results provide evidence supporting the use of ravulizumab for the treatment of complement inhibitor-naive patients with PNH regardless of transfusion history, baseline hemolysis level, sex, age, race, or geographic region. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Weitz: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kulagin:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Nakao:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd.: Honoraria. Szer:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel Support , Research Funding. Rottinghaus:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Volles:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Damokosh:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Aguzzi:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Larratt:Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Risitano:Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amyndas Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,496
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,017
Tête enseignante GPT0,251
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetComplement system in diseasesTravaux en français237 207