MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2900183696 · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-99-119086

Efficacy and Safety of a Single Dose of Donor Lymphocytes Depleted of Alloreactive T-Cells (ATIR101) Following T-Cell-Depleted Haploidentical HSCT: A Pooled Analysis of Two Phase II Studies

2018· article· en· W2900183696 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Denis‐Claude Roy, Irwin Walker, Johan Maertens, Philippe Lewalle, Eduardo Olavarría, Yves Béguin, Dominik Selleslag, Eva-Maria Wagner, Halvard Bönig, Gerard M.J. Bos, Stephan Mielke

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCAR-T cell therapy research
Établissements canadiensMcMaster UniversityJuravinski HospitalHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationGraft-versus-host diseaseStem cellInternal medicineImmune systemTransplantationImmunologyT cellLeukemiaGastroenterologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: An ex vivo photodepletion method has been developed to produce ATIR101 (Kiadis Pharma), a donor lymphocyte infusion (2.0 × 106 cells/kg) administered after haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) to aid immune reconstitution. ATIR101 is depleted of alloreactive T-cells and early administration after T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT has the potential to reduce serious complications resulting from delayed immune reconstitution, such as infections, malignant relapse, and severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in the recipient. The safety and efficacy of a single dose of ATIR101 are presented here in a pooled analysis of two phase II clinical trials: CR-AIR-007 (NCT01794299) & CR-AIR-008 (NCT02500550). Methods: A pooled analysis of 37 adult patients who received haplo-HSCT. All but 3 patients have completed 1 year of follow-up (data cut-off: June 1, 2018). The study designs are aligned, with similar inclusion and exclusion criteria and baseline patient characteristics. Overall, 32 patients received a single dose of ATIR101; n=5 did not receive ATIR101 and discontinued after HSCT due to death (n=2), graft failure (n=1), and rejection of the ATIR101 batch (n=2). In the pooled cohort, n=24 had acute myeloid leukemia (65%), n=10 had acute lymphoblastic leukemia (27%), and n=3 had myelodysplastic syndromes (8%), with 57% of patients having an intermediate disease risk index (DRI) and 43% a high DRI. All patients underwent myeloablative conditioning followed by a CD34+ selected stem cell graft from a haploidentical family donor. ATIR101, prepared from the same donor, was given at a median of 28 days post HSCT as a single dose of 2.0 × 106 cells/kg, without the use of prophylactic immunosuppression. These data were compared with outcomes from a historic control group of 35 patients treated with a T-cell-depleted CD34+ selected haplo-HSCT without ATIR101 at overlapping participating hospitals in a prospectively planned registry study (CR-AIR-006, NCT02188290). Results: Thirty-six patients engrafted, with neutrophil engraftment at a median of 14 days (range 8-34) and platelet engraftment at a median of 12 days (range 7-35) post HSCT. Outcomes are shown in Table 1. In the pooled cohort, non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 33% and relapse-related mortality was 8%, compared with 66% and 15%, respectively, in the historic control group. The overall survival (OS) of patients was 58% in the pooled cohort (Figure 1A) and 20% in the historic control group. In the pooled cohort, total chronic GVHD was 3%, chronic severe GVHD was 0%, and acute GVHD grade III-IV was 5%, with 0% grade IV; in the historic control group, the results for total chronic GVHD, chronic severe GVHD, and acute GVHD grade III-IV were 11%, 9%, and 6%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier curve for survival without grade III/IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD requiring systemic treatment, or relapse (GRFS) showed significant separation for the pooled cohort versus the historic control group (P=0.01; Figure 1B); the GRFS rates for the two groups were 53% and 20%, respectively. Conclusion: OS was nearly threefold higher in the pooled cohort than in patients not receiving ATIR101 after haplo-HSCT in the historic control group. These outcomes were achieved without the need for concomitant high-dose immunosuppressive therapy. Disease relapse was limited and NRM in the pooled cohort was half that of the historic control group. Administration of a single dose of ATIR101 after a T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT was well tolerated. The rate of GVHD is lower in the pooled cohort than the historic control group, suggesting that ATIR101 does not increase GVHD beyond the levels reported with a T-cell-depleted CD34+ selected HSCT alone. GRFS in the pooled cohort was >2.5-fold higher than the historic control group and also seems higher than GRFS rates previously reported for other studies using post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) after T-cell-replete HSCT (Solh 2017, McCurdy 2017). To further investigate the therapeutic potential of ATIR101, a large, phase III, randomized control trial is currently underway to assess the relative safety and efficacy of ATIR101 after T-cell-depleted haplo-HSCT, versus PTCy after T-cell-replete haplo-HSCT (CR-AIR-009 HATCY; NCT02999854). Disclosures Roy: University of Montreal: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent; Kiadis Pharma: Other: Travel support; Hopital Maisonneuve Rosemont: Patents & Royalties: Author on patent. Beguin:Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy. Selleslag:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Financial support for study-related issues. Wagner:Medac: Other: Travel grant. Bonig:Kiadis Pharma: Consultancy. Mielke:Kiadis Pharma: Other: Travel grants, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,035

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,006
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,310 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2018
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCAR-T cell therapy researchTravaux en français237 207