<i>The Parliaments of Autonomous Nations</i>, Edited by Guy Laforest and André Lecours
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In the last 30 years, our understanding of minority nationalism and the dynamics involved in minority mobilization, political demands, and minority–majority relations have been the subject of numerous publications. While many of these works have focused on the rise of minority nationalism in the established liberal democracies of Canada, the UK, and Spain, more recent work has also looked at minority nationalism in other cases, such as Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ethiopia, Iraq, and Nepal. In short, we have a good understanding of the reasons for minorities to demand political recognition and territorial autonomy, both in the West and in non-Western cases. Moreover, we also know how majorities have responded to minority nationalism through political and legal means. All of these topics have been the theme of a rather substantial body of literature. However, as Laforest and Lecours make clear in the introductory section to their edited volume, the same cannot be said about the role of parliaments in the request of minorities to be recognised and self-identify. In fact, they state very directly that “we can safely say that the study of parliaments and the field of nationalism have really never been connected” (p. 7). Indeed, it is the major contribution of this edited volume to look at a number of parliaments in territories that have been traditionally associated with minority nations. The cases of Catalonia (Carles Viver Pi-Sunyer and Mirei Grau Creus), the Basque Country (Alberto López Basaguren), Galicia (José Julio Fernández Rodríguez), Flanders (Martine Goossens and Michiel Elst), Quebec (François Rocher and Marie-Christine Gilbert), Scotland (Michael Keating), and Northern Ireland (Guy Laforest) are discussed as examples of minority nations’ parliaments. The picture that emerges from these case studies is interesting—these parliaments have some elements in common such as acting as representations of the identity of the different groups and as forums in which demands for minority nations are being discussed, formulated and reconstituted. However, the chapters also demonstrate the internal dynamics in these parliaments and the fact that minority nationalism is by far not as coherent as many assume. Scotland is an example for this battleground, where the leading political party—the Scottish National Party—has strongly focused on a secessionist agenda, a project rejected by all other parties in the Scottish Parliament. Likewise, the Parliament of Northern Ireland (known as Stormont) is a reflection of the deep division of this part of the UK. Similar debates about questions of secession and further autonomy for the minority nation are most visible in Catalonia and Quebec, as well as in Flanders.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».