The Scottish Invention of Canadian Literature? John Buchan in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
IN 1935, WHEN JOHN BUCHAN (1875–1940) was appointed Governor General of Canada, he had already been a prolific author for forty years. He had worked as a journalist and war correspondent, and written histories, biographies, and of course the thrillers for which he is still known today; in fact, just prior to his departure for Canada, he had attended the premiere of Alfred Hitchcock's adaptation of his most famous novel, The Thirty-Nine Steps . However, Buchan could also look back upon a distinguished career as an administrator and politician: he had spent two years on the staff of the High Commissioner for South Africa, he had coordinated British First World War propaganda, he had been Deputy- Chairman of Reuter's, and he had served as Member of Parliament for the Scottish Universities. As Governor General, he could draw upon skills acquired in these (and numerous other) roles, most strikingly when handling Canadian, American, and British media so as to maximize public interest in his extensive journeys across the length and width of Canada, or in the charities and other organizations which he patronized. In the following, it will, of course, not be claimed that Buchan “really” invented Canadian literature, certainly not in the sense in which this claim has been made for English literature, or rather English Literature, in the volume to which the title of this essay alludes, Robert Crawford's The Scottish Invention of English Literature (1998). In Crawford's volume, contributors suggest that English Literature was initially taught as a subject in eighteenth-century Scottish universities, and was then exported to newly independent America, to British colonies such as Canada, India, and Australia, and ultimately to England itself. It will, however, be argued that Buchan did promote the concept of Canadian literature as a distinct tradition with unique features, and, perhaps more controversially, that he contributed to this tradition himself. To this purpose, the essay will first sketch Buchan's engagement with three quintessentially Canadian issues, multiculturalism, the North, and, indeed, “CanLit.” In a second step, it will be shown how Buchan fictionalized these issues in his last novel, Sick Heart River (published posthumously in 1941, cited here from the 2007 edition).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,033 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».