The Scottish Invention of Canadian Literature? John Buchan in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IN 1935, WHEN JOHN BUCHAN (1875–1940) was appointed Governor General of Canada, he had already been a prolific author for forty years. He had worked as a journalist and war correspondent, and written histories, biographies, and of course the thrillers for which he is still known today; in fact, just prior to his departure for Canada, he had attended the premiere of Alfred Hitchcock's adaptation of his most famous novel, The Thirty-Nine Steps . However, Buchan could also look back upon a distinguished career as an administrator and politician: he had spent two years on the staff of the High Commissioner for South Africa, he had coordinated British First World War propaganda, he had been Deputy- Chairman of Reuter's, and he had served as Member of Parliament for the Scottish Universities. As Governor General, he could draw upon skills acquired in these (and numerous other) roles, most strikingly when handling Canadian, American, and British media so as to maximize public interest in his extensive journeys across the length and width of Canada, or in the charities and other organizations which he patronized. In the following, it will, of course, not be claimed that Buchan “really” invented Canadian literature, certainly not in the sense in which this claim has been made for English literature, or rather English Literature, in the volume to which the title of this essay alludes, Robert Crawford's The Scottish Invention of English Literature (1998). In Crawford's volume, contributors suggest that English Literature was initially taught as a subject in eighteenth-century Scottish universities, and was then exported to newly independent America, to British colonies such as Canada, India, and Australia, and ultimately to England itself. It will, however, be argued that Buchan did promote the concept of Canadian literature as a distinct tradition with unique features, and, perhaps more controversially, that he contributed to this tradition himself. To this purpose, the essay will first sketch Buchan's engagement with three quintessentially Canadian issues, multiculturalism, the North, and, indeed, “CanLit.” In a second step, it will be shown how Buchan fictionalized these issues in his last novel, Sick Heart River (published posthumously in 1941, cited here from the 2007 edition).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.033 | 0.019 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".