MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2903552843 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.11.004

No increased sensitization from early vaccination of infants: a prospective study of infant vaccination in anthroposophical families

2018· article· en· W2903552843 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lennart Nilsson

Notice bibliographique

RevueEClinicalMedicine · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineVaccinationPediatricsImmunizationDiphtheriaTetanusAllergyPertussis vaccineImmunologyImmune system

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Vaccination against infectious diseases is of the utmost importance for the health of our children. Therefore, it is good that the vaccination coverage today is extensive, e.g. estimated at 86% for children globally for vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccination [[1]https://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/burden/vpd/surveillance_type/passive/pertussis/en/Google Scholar]. The age when these vaccine doses are administered differs between countries, but the first doses are normally given between 6 weeks and 3 months of age. Besides the risk of infection, does the age of the infant at the first immunization have any other consequences for the health of the child? It has been proposed that there could be a shift in the T-helper cell type 1/T-helper cell type 2/regulatory T cells balance and that more allergic diseases will develop with early vaccination in infancy. Previous studies have been contradictory with respect to the association of immunization at an early age with the development of allergic diseases. Kiraly et al. [[2]Kiraly N. Koplin J.J. Crawford N.W. Bannister S. et al.Timing of routine infant vaccinations and risk of food allergy and eczema at one year of age.Allergy. 2016; 71: 541-549Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar] found no association with the first vaccine doses (DTaP and invariably Hep B, Hib, PCV, rotavirus) at around 2 months vs >3 months for food allergy or atopic sensitization. There was, however, an increase in eczema at one year of age. MacDonald et al. found a negative association between delay in administration of the first dose of whole-cell pertussis vaccine in DPT immunization in childhood and the development of asthma; the association was greater with delays in all of the first 3 doses [[3]McDonald K.L. Huq S.I. Lix L.M. Becker A.B. Kozyrskyj A.L. Delay in diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of childhood asthma.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 121: 626-631Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar]. This Canadian study used retrospective data, which might have led to selection bias. However, Grüber et al. [[4]Grüber C. Warner J. Hill D. Bauchau V. EPAAC Study Group Early atopic disease and early childhood immunization—is there a link?.Allergy. 2008; 63: 1464-1472Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar] showed in children at heightened risk of atopy that common childhood immunization in the first year was not associated with an increased risk of more severe eczema or allergic sensitization. They recommended that parents of atopic children should be encouraged to fully immunize their children. After 14 years of no general pertussis vaccination, almost 82,000 Swedish children were immunized for pertussis in a vaccination trial [[5]Vogt H. Bråbäck L. Kling A.M. Grünewald M. Nilsson L. Pertussis immunization in infancy and adolescent asthma medication.Pediatrics. 2014; 134: 721-728Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar]. Data for the main outcome variable (i.e., dispensed prescribed asthma medication for each individual in the cohort during 2008–2010) were obtained from the national prescription database. Children vaccinated at 2, 4, and 6 months were compared with children vaccinated at 3, 5, and 12 months; the timing of vaccination did not affect the outcome. In this journal, Swartz et al. report about families with an anthroposophical lifestyle who are restrictive with vaccinations [[6]Swartz J. Aronsson B. Lindblad F. et al.Vaccination and allergic sensitization in early childhood – the ALADDIN birth cohort.EClinicalMedicine. 2018; 4-5: 92-98Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (5) Google Scholar]. They start later with the vaccination program if they immunize their children at all. A total of 466 children fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 339–396 children were evaluated on four occasions between birth and 5 years of age. There was no increase in allergic sensitization in relation to age at the first vaccination, the total number of vaccinations or the total number of vaccines. Nor could they find any relation between measles, mumps and rubella vaccination and allergic sensitization. This is one of the studies that indicate that there is no increased risk attached to vaccination at 3 months of age rather than later start of the vaccinations. Vaccination at an early age is crucial to prevent infections with significant risk of mortality in infancy. It is difficult to find studies with vaccinated and non-vaccinated infants living within the same or adjacent areas. Anthroposophical communities live adjacent to the rest of society, often in the countryside, but their lifestyle differs from that of more conventional families. They have a more individualized vaccination program; some are not vaccinated at all. However, their lifestyle is different in several other aspects such as longer breastfeeding periods, a biodynamic/organic, largely vegetarian, diet and restrictive use of certain drugs, such as antipyretics. As in the case of farming people with animals, they report significantly fewer allergic diseases. It is not a large study, but the researchers have followed the children prospectively and therefore delete risks of recall bias or reverse causation, i.e. instead of X causing Y, the opposite is true. The study has one drawback; there is no information about symptoms of allergies or asthma in the children, which would have been of value. Objective evaluations of symptoms of allergy are, however, hard to compare from health care personnel and the families. Sensitization differs between anthroposophical children and children from ordinary families, but this has been adjusted for. This study shows that vaccination at around 3 months and later on or no vaccination at all does not change allergic sensitization. Anthroposophical families are an important group in this evaluation and an interesting choice of comparative group. Vaccination and Allergic Sensitization in Early Childhood – The ALADDIN Birth CohortWe found no support for an association between early childhood vaccination and subsequent allergic sensitization. Our findings do not support scepticism towards early childhood vaccination motivated by allergy risk. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,016
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,352
Écart entre enseignants0,332 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2018
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEClinicalMedicineMême sujetVaccine Coverage and HesitancyTravaux en français237 207