MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2903552843 · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.11.004

No increased sensitization from early vaccination of infants: a prospective study of infant vaccination in anthroposophical families

2018· article· en· W2903552843 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lennart Nilsson

Bibliographic record

VenueEClinicalMedicine · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineVaccinationPediatricsImmunizationDiphtheriaTetanusAllergyPertussis vaccineImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vaccination against infectious diseases is of the utmost importance for the health of our children. Therefore, it is good that the vaccination coverage today is extensive, e.g. estimated at 86% for children globally for vaccination against diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccination [[1]https://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/burden/vpd/surveillance_type/passive/pertussis/en/Google Scholar]. The age when these vaccine doses are administered differs between countries, but the first doses are normally given between 6 weeks and 3 months of age. Besides the risk of infection, does the age of the infant at the first immunization have any other consequences for the health of the child? It has been proposed that there could be a shift in the T-helper cell type 1/T-helper cell type 2/regulatory T cells balance and that more allergic diseases will develop with early vaccination in infancy. Previous studies have been contradictory with respect to the association of immunization at an early age with the development of allergic diseases. Kiraly et al. [[2]Kiraly N. Koplin J.J. Crawford N.W. Bannister S. et al.Timing of routine infant vaccinations and risk of food allergy and eczema at one year of age.Allergy. 2016; 71: 541-549Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar] found no association with the first vaccine doses (DTaP and invariably Hep B, Hib, PCV, rotavirus) at around 2 months vs >3 months for food allergy or atopic sensitization. There was, however, an increase in eczema at one year of age. MacDonald et al. found a negative association between delay in administration of the first dose of whole-cell pertussis vaccine in DPT immunization in childhood and the development of asthma; the association was greater with delays in all of the first 3 doses [[3]McDonald K.L. Huq S.I. Lix L.M. Becker A.B. Kozyrskyj A.L. Delay in diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccination is associated with a reduced risk of childhood asthma.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 121: 626-631Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (46) Google Scholar]. This Canadian study used retrospective data, which might have led to selection bias. However, Grüber et al. [[4]Grüber C. Warner J. Hill D. Bauchau V. EPAAC Study Group Early atopic disease and early childhood immunization—is there a link?.Allergy. 2008; 63: 1464-1472Crossref PubMed Scopus (43) Google Scholar] showed in children at heightened risk of atopy that common childhood immunization in the first year was not associated with an increased risk of more severe eczema or allergic sensitization. They recommended that parents of atopic children should be encouraged to fully immunize their children. After 14 years of no general pertussis vaccination, almost 82,000 Swedish children were immunized for pertussis in a vaccination trial [[5]Vogt H. Bråbäck L. Kling A.M. Grünewald M. Nilsson L. Pertussis immunization in infancy and adolescent asthma medication.Pediatrics. 2014; 134: 721-728Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar]. Data for the main outcome variable (i.e., dispensed prescribed asthma medication for each individual in the cohort during 2008–2010) were obtained from the national prescription database. Children vaccinated at 2, 4, and 6 months were compared with children vaccinated at 3, 5, and 12 months; the timing of vaccination did not affect the outcome. In this journal, Swartz et al. report about families with an anthroposophical lifestyle who are restrictive with vaccinations [[6]Swartz J. Aronsson B. Lindblad F. et al.Vaccination and allergic sensitization in early childhood – the ALADDIN birth cohort.EClinicalMedicine. 2018; 4-5: 92-98Summary Full Text Full Text PDF Scopus (5) Google Scholar]. They start later with the vaccination program if they immunize their children at all. A total of 466 children fulfilled the inclusion criteria and 339–396 children were evaluated on four occasions between birth and 5 years of age. There was no increase in allergic sensitization in relation to age at the first vaccination, the total number of vaccinations or the total number of vaccines. Nor could they find any relation between measles, mumps and rubella vaccination and allergic sensitization. This is one of the studies that indicate that there is no increased risk attached to vaccination at 3 months of age rather than later start of the vaccinations. Vaccination at an early age is crucial to prevent infections with significant risk of mortality in infancy. It is difficult to find studies with vaccinated and non-vaccinated infants living within the same or adjacent areas. Anthroposophical communities live adjacent to the rest of society, often in the countryside, but their lifestyle differs from that of more conventional families. They have a more individualized vaccination program; some are not vaccinated at all. However, their lifestyle is different in several other aspects such as longer breastfeeding periods, a biodynamic/organic, largely vegetarian, diet and restrictive use of certain drugs, such as antipyretics. As in the case of farming people with animals, they report significantly fewer allergic diseases. It is not a large study, but the researchers have followed the children prospectively and therefore delete risks of recall bias or reverse causation, i.e. instead of X causing Y, the opposite is true. The study has one drawback; there is no information about symptoms of allergies or asthma in the children, which would have been of value. Objective evaluations of symptoms of allergy are, however, hard to compare from health care personnel and the families. Sensitization differs between anthroposophical children and children from ordinary families, but this has been adjusted for. This study shows that vaccination at around 3 months and later on or no vaccination at all does not change allergic sensitization. Anthroposophical families are an important group in this evaluation and an interesting choice of comparative group. Vaccination and Allergic Sensitization in Early Childhood – The ALADDIN Birth CohortWe found no support for an association between early childhood vaccination and subsequent allergic sensitization. Our findings do not support scepticism towards early childhood vaccination motivated by allergy risk. Full-Text PDF Open Access

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.332 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEClinicalMedicineSame topicVaccine Coverage and HesitancyFrench-language works237,207