RF14 A systematic review of 30-day readmissions in adults hospitalised with community-acquired pneumonia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the most common communicable diseases worldwide associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality causing a substantial economic burden. 30-day hospital readmission rate is often used as a secondary outcome in studies of CAP. This data can be used to define the burden of disease and the reasons for readmissions potentially amenable to intervention. A systematic review and random meta-analysis were conducted to estimate the pooled 30-day readmission rate of adult patients with CAP and 30-day pneumonia-related/non-pneumonia-related and cardiovascular-related readmission rates of such patients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED (until October 2017) and reference lists of papers were searched to identify studies of CAP including 30-day hospital readmission rate of adult patients. Each step of the study selection process was conducted by two independent reviewers. The quality was assessed using a pre-tested form based on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled proportions of patients readmitted within 30 days with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were estimated. Additional subgroup analyses were conducted. Results A total of 63 studies were included in the statistical analysis, covering the period from 1994 to 2017. The pooled 30-day readmission rate estimate was 0.10 (CI 0.08–0.11). High levels of heterogeneity were identified, I2=98.95%. Only two subgroups analysis reported statistically significant differences (p-value <0.05). Retrospective studies had a higher readmission rate of 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.14, I2=99.39%) compared to prospective studies, 0.07 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.09, I2=93.35%). Europe had significantly lower 30-day readmission rate, 0.08 (95% CI 0.07 to 0.10, I2=94.98%) than North America, which reported 0.11 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.14, I2=99.50%). Non-pneumonia-related readmissions accounted for 0.60 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.72, I2=89.00%) of all 30-day readmissions. Additionally, 0.31 (95% CI 0.25 to 0.37, I2=79.74%) of 30-day readmissions were pneumonia-related, while 0.20 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.26, I2=33.55%) were cardiovascular-related. The studied populations were mostly composed of elderly patients. High levels of heterogeneity may have been due to different selection criteria of included studies and variations among health-care systems and treatment practices. Conclusion Among all adult patients with CAP, 10% are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. The majority of all-cause readmissions are non-pneumonia-related, specifically 20% are cardiovascular related. Only one third of 30-day readmissions are due to pneumonia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,012 | 0,043 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,011 | 0,014 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,011 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».