Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Kerouac: Language, Poetics, and Territory by Hassan Melehy Annie de Saussure Hassan Melehy. Kerouac: Language, Poetics, and Territory. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016. Pp. xiii + 255. $120.00. Hassan Melehy’s groundbreaking study begins with a simple yet overlooked fact—Kerouac, originally from the French-Canadian community of Lowell, Massachusetts, was a native Fran-cophone speaker. The author reintroduces his readers to Kerouac as not only an astute reader and craftsman of literature, but also a transcultural author whose work explores tensions between roots and travel, settlement and motion, home and the road. Kerouac, Melehy argues, has yet to receive full and due credit for his contribution to literature. His writing demonstrates critical engagement with the Western canon, a testament to his brief time as a student at Columbia. In Dr. Sax: Faust Part Three (Chapter 4), Kerouac expands on Goethe’s legend by setting it in his Massachusetts hometown. The narrator’s Francophone community, Melehy argues, is paradoxically unsettled—exiled both culturally and linguistically in Anglophone New England. Connecting with his cultural heritage, Kerouac also turned to French sources of literary inspiration. In Satori in Paris (Chapter 5), scenes of drunkenness and bodily pleasures, Melehy argues, serve a Rabelaisian function by leveling socio-economic and national distinctions and imagining a utopian, equalizing space of cultural exchange. Disagreeing with the characterization of Kerouac’s work as un-literary or sloppy, Melehy analyzes the author’s honed techniques such as spontaneous prose, automatic writing, and sketching (Chapter 3). Though the Beat author’s fascination with jazz, as the term Beat itself suggests, has been criticized for appropriating African-American culture, Melehy focuses instead on how Kerouac’s use of jazz shaped the mechanics of his poetics, notably in Visions of Cody. In The Town and The City and On the Road, the narrators’ journeys, Melehy shows, convey a sense of exile and dispossession that is rooted in Québécois cultural survivance (Chapters 1–2). Kerouac’s native French informs his literary experimentation in English as he expresses cultural otherness by destabilizing the English language itself. This linguistic experimentation ties to Kerouac’s [End Page 169] understanding of travel, and even writing itself, as an experience that creates new cultural connections, challenges fixed notions of identity, and reveals the inherent, though often hidden, diversity of America. Melehy convincingly explores Kerouac’s “off-whiteness,” or how his otherness challenges American racial boundaries. Readers, however, may still take issue with Melehy’s argument that Sal Paradise’s problematic identification with African-Americans and Latinos in On the Road is a denunciation of the limits of whiteness and white society that seeks to permeate and transcend those racial borders. Finally, the author of this study misses an opportunity to analyze more deeply the thematics of exile and cultural alienation in Satori in Paris in which the narrator searches for his ancestral ‘home’ in Brittany. Addressing the parallels between Québécois and Breton cultures, both marginalized and exiled in their own right, would offer another key iteration of Kerouac’s poetics of territory and exile. Melehy’s work is a timely and vital contribution not just to Beat Generation scholarship, but also to Francophone studies more broadly as the field tends toward inscribing Francophone Literatures in global and transnational paradigms. Annie de Saussure Lafayette College Copyright © 2018 L’Esprit Créateur
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».